Pages

Wednesday, July 3, 2019

"Clarence Thomas Vs. The Evidence," David Leonhardt's Account Of An Alleged Murderer

Image result for Clarence thomas "pax on both houses"
Clarence Thomas Supreme Court Nomination
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_Thomas_Supreme_Court_nomination
The New York Times
The New York Times

Tuesday, July 2, 2019

Op-Ed Columnist

Op-Ed Columnist

The Supreme Court recently threw out the quadruple murder conviction of Curtis Flowers, a Mississippi man whom I’ve written about before. It was a good decision. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing an opinion signed by six other justices, documented the numerous dishonest methods that the prosecutor used to keep African-Americans off the jury at Flowers’s trial.
In today’s newsletter, though, I want to focus on a single paragraph from the dissent, which Justice Clarence Thomas wrote. (Justice Neil Gorsuch joined much of the dissent.) The paragraph betrays a distressing disregard for evidence that’s symbolic of a much larger problem in our justice system.
The paragraph is near the beginning of the 42-page dissent, and it summarizes what Thomas evidently considers to be the strongest evidence against Flowers:
“On the morning of the murders, a .380-caliber pistol was reported stolen from the car of Flowers’ uncle, and a witness saw Flowers by that car before the shootings. Officers recovered .380-caliber bullets at Tardy Furniture [the site of the murders] and matched them to bullets fired by the stolen pistol. Gunshot residue was found on Flowers’ hand a few hours after the murders. A bloody footprint found at the scene matched both the size of Flowers’ shoes and the shoe style that he was seen wearing on the morning of the murders. Multiple witnesses placed Flowers near Tardy Furniture that morning, and Flowers provided inconsistent accounts of his whereabouts. Several hundred dollars were missing from the store’s cash drawer, and $235 was found hidden in Flowers’ headboard after the murders.”
Anyone who has followed this case — especially anyone who has listened to “In the Dark,” a prize-winning podcast from Madeleine Baran, Samara Freemark and their colleagues at American Public Media — knows that much of this evidence falls apart under scrutiny.
To take a few examples: An investigator for the district attorney appears to have fabricated evidence about the shoes. Investigators also seem to have coached witnesses to remember — months later — seeing Flowers near the furniture store. The $235 apparently found at Flowers’s home doesn’t match the amount taken from the store. And the test for gunshot residue wasn’t done until after Flowers had been interrogated at a police station, where small amounts of residue are common. The amount of residue on Flowers’s hands? A single particle.
If you listen to the podcast, you come away amazed by the thinness of the evidence against him and by the willingness of police and prosecutors to exaggerate it. To this day, no witness has tied Flowers to the scene of the crime, nor has any reliable physical evidence. More than one witness has recanted testimony given at trial.
I can’t say for sure that Flowers is innocent. But based on the evidence I’ve heard, I would vote to acquit him without agonizing over it. The case against him is shockingly weak and relies on claims by the prosecution that have been proven to be false.
Yet Thomas and Gorsuch don’t appear to have engaged with any of this evidence. They simply accepted the version of events offered by the prosecutor — Doug Evans, a man with a record of lying in court.
Curtis Flowers remains behind bars, where he has been since 1997, while the same prosecutor decides whether to try him again. Many other Americans — most of them black and male, like Flowers — also sit in prison or jail today because of evidence that judges or prosecutors refuse to acknowledge as flimsy or manufactured.
It reminds of me a heartbreaking quotation in “Just Mercy,” Bryan Stevenson’s 2014 book about systemic injustice: “They aren’t ever going to admit they made a mistake,” says a man unjustly convicted of murder. “They know I didn’t do this. They just can’t admit to being wrong, to looking bad.”

2 comments:

  1. HELLO! WELCOME TO THE GREAT TEMPLE OF ILLUMINATI WORLD RICHES.

    Are you a business Man, politician, musical, student and you want to be rich, powerful and be famous in life. You can achieve your dreams by being a member of the Illuminati brotherhood, and receive a monthly salary of $500,000USD.

    All members that are belong to this great Society always received a benefit of $50,000 so I guess you are willing to become a member?? 

    We are ready to change your life, we can make your Dreams come true, also are going to gives you everything that you need in this Life ....

    * Riches 

    *Power

    *Famous

    *Wealth

    With this all your dreams and heart desire can be fully accomplish,
    if you really want to be a member of the great Illuminati Brotherhood then contact us via: Email:officialilluminati999@gmail.com

    Best Regards.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is an open invitation for all of you to become part of the largest organization in the world and reach the top of your career. As this year's recruiting programmer begins and our annual harvest party is almost at hand. The Grandmaster gave us the mandate to always reach people like you, so take this opportunity and join the great Illuminati organization, join our global unit. Bring the poor, needy and talented to the prominence of fame and wealth.

    Get money, fame, powers, security, get. Recognized in your business, political career, ascend to the highest in whatever you do, be Protected spiritually and physically! All this you will achieve in a gleam of eyes

    The Illuminati have no association with Satanism, Luciferism or any religion. While our individual members are allowed to follow whatever deity they choose, we operate solely for the benefit and protection of the human species.



    Do you accept being a member of this new Illuminati world order?

    Contact: illuminati.666.god.of.light@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete