Pages

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Drug Overdoses Now Kill Significantly More Americans Than Automobile Accidents Or Guns


46,471: DRUG OVERDOSES KILLED MORE AMERICANS THAN CAR CRASHES OR GUNS

That compares with the 35,369 who died in motor vehicle crashes and 33,636 who died from firearms



By Susan Jones | November 5, 2015 

More than half of the 46,471 drug-related deaths in 2013 were caused by prescription painkillers and heroin, the DEA says. (AP File Photo)
(CNSNews.com) - "Drug overdose deaths are the leading cause of injury death in the United States, ahead of motor vehicle deaths and firearms (deaths)," the Drug Enforcement Agency announced on Wednesday.

In 2013, the most recent year for which data is available, 46,471 people in the United States died from drug overdoses, and more than half of those deaths were caused by prescription painkillers and heroin.

That compares with the 35,369 who died in motor vehicle crashes and 33,636 who died from firearms, as tallied by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“Sadly this report confirms what we’ve known for some time: drug abuse is ending too many lives while destroying families and communities,” Acting DEA Administrator Chuck Rosenberg said as he released the 2015 National Drug Threat Assessment.

“We must stop drug abuse before it begins by teaching young people at an even earlier age about its many dangers and horrors."

Rosenberg spoke one day after Ohio voters rejected a ballot proposal that would have legalized both recreational and medical marijuana use. But 23 other states and Washington, D.C., allow the use of marijuana for medicinal and/or recreational purposes.

The DEA ranks controlled prescription drugs and heroin as the most significant drug threats to the United States.

It also views marijuana concentrates, with potency levels far exceeding those of leaf marijuana, as an "issue of growing concern."

Meanwhile, the issue of drug abuse is making its way into the presidential campaign, as some of the candidates talk about their personal experience with addictions and even deaths.

"My husband, Frank, and I buried a child to drug addiction," Carly Fiorina said at one of the Republican debates.

Jeb Bush's daughter was arrested on drug-related charges in 2002, and she has spent time in rehab. He has discussed this at some of his campaign stops.

And a video of Chris Christie talking about his good friend who became addicted to painkillers -- and died -- has now gone viral.

The National Drug Threat Assessment also discusses the traffickers, concluding that "Mexican gangs remain the greatest criminal drug threat to the United States."

The DEA notes that, according to reports from law enforcement, some of these Mexican gangs are "relocating from major metropolitan areas to establish bases of operation in suburban or rural areas."

Malicious State Of Israel Bulldozes 23 West Bank Homes Belonging To Impoverished Palestinians

A distraught Palestinian family amid the remains of their home after it was demolished by Israelis in Musafir Jenbah. 

"Is Israel The World's Worst Terror State? An Israeli General's Son Thinks So"

God's Realtors: Israeli Settlements As Roadblocks To Peace

433% More Americans Died From Fireworks Than Israeli Citizens From Hamas Rockets

Palestinian families homeless as Israeli military demolishes West Bank houses

Israeli bulldozers destroy 23 houses in two West Bank villages within controversial ‘military’ zone in one of biggest demolitions of recent years

Israeli military bulldozers have demolished 23 houses in two impoverished southern West Bank villages, including structures that were home to more than 100 people.
The demolitions, one of the most significant in recent memory, occurred in a controversial Israeli-designated military area known as Firing Zone 918, which comprises approximately 115 square miles (300 sq km) and was declared restricted by the Israelis in the 1970s.
The action came despite a long-running and internationally high-profile campaign to protect the eight villages in the zone, including a petition signed by some of the world’s most famous authors.
Human rights groups have repeatedly challenged Israel’s claim to the land, arguing it is illegal to establish a military zone in occupied territory. Tuesday’s demolitions were described by the Israeli veterans group Breaking the Silence – which has long supported the villages – as one of the biggest demolitions in the past decade.
Israeli bulldozers moved into Khirbet Jenbah and the nearby hamlet of Khirbat el-Halawa just after dawn on Tuesday morning, destroying a dozen homes in Jenbah itself as well as other structures, some of which are funded by European countries including the UK.
According to Israeli NGO Peace Now, among the 110 people made homeless during the demolitions were dozens of children from 12 different families.
The 12 buildings destroyed were among 40 properties that had been earlier earmarked for destruction, in three locations in a remote area of rolling hills accessible only by dirt roads. The destruction of the remaining buildings was temporarily halted after lawyers for the villagers obtained a court injunction, which provided a stay of execution until next week.
The families, many of whose homes are attached to caves that are also used as houses, argue that their families have lived on the land since long before Israeloccupied the West Bank in 1967.

Villagers in Khirbet Jenbah rescue furniture following house demolitions by the Israeli military
Pinterest
Villagers in Khirbet Jenbah rescue furniture following house demolitions. More than 80 villagers lost their homes in a single morning. Photograph: Peter Beaumont for the Guardian

Villages like Jenbah are some of the poorest in the West Bank, unconnected to the grid and reliant on donated solar panels, some of which were destroyed by the Israeli military.
On Tuesday villagers dug through the remains of their homes, set up temporary tents and transported furniture they had managed to save from houses to the places they planned to sleep.
Among them was Khalid Hussein Jabari, who lost his house in Khirbet Jenbah along with other family members. Standing over the ruins of his brother’s house he said: “They came the day before and marked the houses for demolition. We knew it was serious because some of the villagers who can understand Hebrew heard the soldiers talking about how the buildings were going to be destroyed.”
“I was in [a nearby town] when I heard the news at 3.30 on Tuesday morning. I just got back here when the bulldozers arrived, just after 5am.”
A few metres away Mahmoud Ahmad Isa, 30, watched as members of his family moved furniture down a flight of stone stairs into a cave entrance next to the wreckage of his home.
“It is wet [in the cave] but we’ll see how we get on. The first thing we need to do is clear the rubble and rebuild,” he added. “We don’t have any other alternative.”
While Israel has long wanted to move the villages, located in part of the occupied territories known as Area C, which is under full Israeli administrative and security control, the villagers have enjoyed high-profile international support.
Two years ago 51 acclaimed international authors, among them Mario Vargas Llosa, Seamus Heaney and Orhan Pamuk, signed a petition asking the Israeli government to allow the villages to remain.
It is also not the first time the Israeli military has destroyed Khirbet Jenbah. The village was demolished in its entirety in 1999. The villagers, however, returned later and won a court ruling allowing them to stay on the land if they agreed to arbitration with the military.


On Monday, however, the state of Israel declared that mediation had failed because of the villagers’ unwillingness to relocate,. A statement from Cogat, the Israeli defence ministry unit that administers civilian affairs in the West Bank, confirmed that “enforcement measures were taken against illegal structures and solar panels built within a military zone”.
Cogat said the negotiations failed as “the building owners showed no willingness to get the situation in order and illegal construction did not stop”. As such, “measures were taken in accordance with the law”, it added.
Campaigners on behalf of Jenbah and other villages in the south Hebron hills – and more widely in Area C – point out, however, that Israel consistently refuses to give building permits to villagers or permit development of communities despite allowing construction by Jewish settlers in the same hills.
Commenting on the demolitions, Sarit Michaeli of the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem said: “This basically means we are back to square one. The government wants to remove them. The residents object.”
Others flagged up the timing of the demolitions. Knesset member Dov Khenin of the Israeli Arab Joint List said he had written to Israeli defence minister Moshe Ya’alon pointing out that the house destructions would leave people homeless in the middle of the cold winter months.
“The decision came without prior warning, in a sudden and extreme move that will leave many families without a roof over their heads during the winter,” Khenin said.

Miriam al-Shehadeh, aged 70, (right) sits in the rubble of her home
Pinterest
 Miriam al-Shehadeh, aged 70, (right) sits in the rubble of her home, one of a dozen destroyed in Khirbet Jenbah on Tuesday. Photograph: Peter Beaumont for the Guardian

Sitting in the rubble of her home in the village under a dark sky spitting rain, 70-year old Miriam al-Shehadeh said: “I am going to stay. We will rebuild. And if the Israelis demolish it again, then they demolish it again. We are farmers and this is where we earn our income.”

Sanders And Cruz: The 2 Numbers That Matter From Yesterday's Iowa Caucuses

The two numbers that explain Iowa caucus vote

For clues to the primary race ahead, two key numbers from Monday night's Iowa caucus stand out.

Two numbers explain a lot about what happened in last night’s Iowa caucuses – and what might now occur in the primary race ahead.
The first is 64. That’s the percentage of Hawkeye State GOP caucus goers who were Evangelicals, according to entrance polls. That’s much higher than anticipated: The final Des Moines Register poll released Saturday assumed that about 47 percent of Republican caucus attendees would be evangelical Christians.
Ted Cruz did really well with these voters. He won about one-third of Evangelicals, while Donald Trump won about one-fifth.
“And that pretty much explains Cruz’s victory,” writes John McCormack in the right-leaning Weekly Standard.
Senator Cruz outperformed his poll numbers and pulled off a surprising win because Evangelicals turned out in big numbers. Among non-evangelical voters, he lost to Trump, 22 to 29 percent. That’s close to how final polls had predicted the caucuses would end up.
What’s the larger meaning of this? That polling is really hard, for one thing. Miss on the electorate’s demographics, and you miss on final numbers. It’s not just about predicting how people will vote. It’s about predicting who will vote, as well.
Also, Mr. Trump may have upended the race, but he hasn’t destroyed the effectiveness of old-style retail campaigning. Cruz – the son of a preacher – worked for years to win the grass-roots religious vote. Trump targeted a few evangelical leaders whose endorsement would make cable news, such as Liberty University’s Jerry Falwell Jr. Cruz’s approach won, and he appears to be the Evangelicals’ 2016 favorite.
The second number is 84. That’s the percentage of voters age 18 to 29 won by Bernie Sanders, according to an NBC exit poll.
That’s dominance, at least in that age group. Senator Sanders won the next oldest group as well, taking 58 percent of voters age 30 to 44.
Look at it this way: Sanders did better with young voters than did Barack Obama in his hope-and-change campaign of 2008. Obama won 57 percent of the under-29 crowd in that year’s Iowa Democratic caucus.
Young adults made up a smaller share of the vote this time around, 18 percent of caucus attendees, as opposed to 22 percent in 2008, points outVox’s Sarah Kliff.
“Still, enough of them got behind Sanders that they were able to boost his performance significantly – and send him off to New Hampshire in a strong way,” writes Ms. Kliff.
Sanders is the polling leader in upcoming New Hampshire, but after that he faces a tough slog. Nevada, South Carolina, and other upcoming primaries feature far more minority and moderate voters, who skew Hillary Clinton’s way.
But his Iowa dominance with young voters shows how he has tapped into a real strain of discontent in a core Democratic constituency. The Clinton campaign clearly underestimated Sanders, and is lucky to escape Iowa with a virtual tie it can portray as a victory.
Sanders speaks to young people’s feelings that their own futures are at stake in the election, writes left-leaning Greg Sargent at his Plum Line Washington Post blog. Mrs. Clinton has yet to demonstrate an ability to do the same thing.
“So another lesson for Clinton may be that she needs to speak more effectively to these voters – and that this could matter in November, because it raises questions as to whether she can sufficiently energize them in Obama-like numbers,” writes Mr. Sargent.

After Iowa, Keep Your Eye On Marc Rubio, Not Trump Or Cruz

Marco Rubio Bought A Handgun On Christmas Eve

Republican Lawmaker From Nevada Sends Christmas Card Featuring Fully Armed Family


Marco Rubio Does 180 On Immigration: Not Only "Sees" Trump But Raises The Ante"

Marco Rubio's View Of Christianity And What It Means For His Politics
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2016/01/marco-rubios-view-of-christianity-and.html

Marco Rubio Stokes America's Theocratic Fervor
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2016/01/marco-rubio-stokes-americas-theocratic.html

Scare The Sheep 
And They Will Applaud Military-Industrial Profiteering

After Iowa, keep your eye on Marco Rubio, not Trump or Cruz




The 2016 primary season began Monday night in Iowa
And the results were not what was expected. At least on the Republican side.
In the final Des Moines Register poll, released over the weekend, Trump was up five points over Ted Cruz 28-23. And in the Real Clear Politics average, he also held a five-point lead.
But the outcome Monday night didn’t look anything like what was predicted.
The race was called for Cruz with 28 percent of the vote to 24 percent for Trump and 23 percent for Rubio.
Cruz’s ground game is due most of the credit. For months, Cruz has had the most elaborate organization in the state where he spent majority of his time campaigning specifically with the Evangelical community. The son of a pastor, Cruz always connected well with this all important group in Iowa and wound up with 62 percent support. And though Jerry Falwell, Jr. endorsed Donald Trump, the final days of the campaign showed quite clearly that Cruz was hugely popular with this community.
Indeed, the Cruz camp over-performed the polls, turned out people in the suburbs and used big data to their advantage by targeting those who would be open to Cruz even if he wasn’t their first choice. And it paid off.
Donald Trump officials are already saying that he never expected to win Iowa. We all know that it didn’t sound like that since he took the lead there and it especially didn’t sound like that when he declined to attend the Fox News debate last week. It’s doubtful that he would have sat out the debate if he had thought a first place finish was in jeopardy, but we’ll never really know what was going on in Trump’s head.
It doesn’t matter much now.
It’s actually more important to take note of how well Marco Rubio did on Monday evening.
He came into the Iowa caucus with 16 percent of the vote and he managed to pull in a remarkable 23 percent -- just one point shy of Trump. He did this while being the subject of relentless attack ads by Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz supported Super PACs, the most scarring – or meant to be the most scarring – of which painted him as the Republican Barack Obama.
Nevertheless, Rubio obviously won voters over with his argument that he’s electable. This is something I’ve been arguing for years.
Rubio has a compelling vision for the future of this nation. He is strong on national security and the most adept speaker.
He’s a fierce debater and has been the most pointed in his criticisms of Hillary Clinton.
It obviously paid off.
As Rubio said Monday night in his speech after the results came in, people told him he had to wait his turn, but his turn is now. And with movement in New Hampshire in his favor, we could very well be starting to see the ascension of the GOP nominee.
That isn’t to say that this is decided. Trump will not go away and Cruz will gain steam after his big win tonight. But the demographics in New Hampshire are very different and Cruz certainly doesn’t have the same kind of chance as he did in Iowa to pull off an upset.
But watch Marco Rubio. You’ll be glad you did.
Douglas E. Schoen has served as a pollster for President Bill Clinton. He has more than 30 years experience as a pollster and political consultant. He is also a Fox News contributor and co-host of "Fox News Insiders" Sundays on Fox News Channel and Mondays at 10:30 am ET on FoxNews.com Live. He is the author of 11 books. His latest, co-authored with Malik Kaylan is "The Russia-China Axis: The New Cold War and America's Crisis of Leadership (Encounter Books, September 2014). Follow Doug on Twitter @DouglasESchoen.

Late Life Interview With Jefferson Airplane's Paul Kantner

Jefferson Airplane in its 1967 hey-day (left to right): Jack Casady, Jorma Kaukonen, Grace Slick, Marty Balin (window), the late Spencer Dryden and the late Paul Kantner. (Photo courtesy of Wikipedia)

Jefferson Airplane in its 1967 hey-day (left to right): Jack Casady,

Jorma Kaukonen, Grace Slick, Marty Balin (window), the late Spencer

Dryden and the late Paul Kantner. (Photo courtesy of Wikipedia)

Jorma Kaukonen, Jack Casady: On Jefferson Airplane, Paul Kantner, Grace Slick


Jim Clash, Forbes Magazine

With the sudden passing last week of two founding members of Jefferson Airplane – guitarist Paul Kantner and original female singer Signe Toly Anderson – one is reminded how quickly amazing people can disappear. Both were 74 years old and died of natural causes, coincidentally on the same day.
Earlier, we published Jorma Kaukonen’s heartfelt “Cracks In The Finish” blog entries mourning the loss of his two ex-band mates.
Last fall, we had Kaukonen and Jack Casady on stage at The Explorers Club for a live interview. Many things were discussed in that hour and a half, but the following edited excerpts seem particularly relevant today. They touch on the love and respect that existed – and exists – between Airplane band members for all the decades since the bitter break-up into Starship and Hot Tuna.

Jim Clash: Do you, Paul, Grace and the gang keep in touch?
Jorma Kaukonen: I had dinner with Paul last year, Japanese – even paid for it! And I talk to Grace all the time. I see her [and Paul's] daughter, China, from time to time. Grace was one of the great voices of our time. I respect the fact she’s chosen to be a painter rather than a singer. She had this huge talent, but it didn’t consume her the way it did me and Jack. To me the magic of Jefferson Airplane, outside of great songs, was the exciting interplay between the people and what was going on at the time. Even if Grace were still singing, I don’t think we could ever recreate that. We tried [at the Airplane reunion] in ’89, and it didn’t work.
Jack Casady: After the split, we were working on our Hot Tuna records, they on the Starship. But we were all kind of incestuous. I’d play on Paul’s solo album, Jorma on Grace’s album. It just seemed too cumbersome to get back together as the Airplane because we were young, finding our directions and it just took its inevitable course. But I see Grace from time to time now. She’s in Los Angeles. I brought the Diana bass I just built, a tribute to my late wife, to show her at her place in Malibu recently. We had a great afternoon, got a chance to talk about some things we never really asked each other. And she asked me a question that really made me tear up and cry right on the spot: “I never really understood, Jack – why DID we break up?” It was a fascinating discussion.
Hot Tuna Bassist Jack Casady (center) and guitarist Jorma Kaukonen (right) interview with Jim Clash at The Explorers Club in November 2015. They discssed all things music, including their ex-band mates from Jefferson Airplane, (Photo: Elliot Severn)
Hot Tuna Bassist Jack Casady (center) and guitarist Jorma Kaukonen
(right) interview with Jim Clash at The Explorers Club in November
2015. They discssed all things music, including their ex-band mates from Jefferson Airplane, (Photo: Elliot Severn)
Clash: What was her take?
Casady: It’s interesting because as with any couple or relationship, stress happens. And you perceive things in a certain way under duress, which could be a complete fabrication in your own mind of the reality at the time. She expressed to me how tough it was in a male world of rock and roll to be that woman who was going to break the path for other women behind her. That takes its toll. It took its toll with Grace to the point she couldn’t see herself playing in a rock band at a later age with all the pressure she put on herself. I’m not sure what’s real and what’s not real. But how she perceived it was real to her. And she just backed away, found another artistic outlet in painting. And that’s okay. When I see her, I don’t try to talk her into playing, which is one reason we get along. I don’t say, “Let’s get the band together!” [laughs].
Clash: Jorma, you’re smiling?
Kaukonen: I say this half in jest: The Airplane had band meetings all the time. Anybody who plays music knows that the worst thing about the business is band meetings. Jack and I have never had a Hot Tuna band meeting ever [laughs]. There was a student at Fur Peace Ranch recently taking a bass class from Jack on Jefferson Airplane songs. He says to me: “Wow, those songs are really hard. I can’t believe how much you guys practiced.” I said, “Well yeah. We practiced relentlessly, eight hours a day.” That’s all we did, so we spent a lot of time together. If you finish a long jam and can still have a sense of humor, who are you going to try jokes on except the people you’re around all the time? I don’t remember what the joke was, but poor Marty [Balin] suddenly went berserk, threw his food down and started to scream, “Same jokes, year after year!”