Pages

Sunday, December 6, 2015

Thinking Housewife: More "Proof" That The Paris Terror Attacks Were Staged By "The Authorities"

The Thinking Housewife Plunges Into The Abyss Of Conspiratorial Thinking
MORE on the interview with Emma Parkinson, the jolly Australian survivor of the Bataclan attack, can be found here. The movie-style production of these interviews is telling — and nauseating.
In related news, Brandon Martinez writes about “The Implausible ‘Cellphone in the Trashbin’ Story” andthis closed-circuit video in the opening minute shows what appears to be a female customer of the Paris restaurant, CafĂ© Le Nostra, tossing an incendiary device through the window in the moments after the cafe was attacked, suggesting she was an operative of some kind, not an ordinary customer. (Analysis providedhere by poster who deserves credit for this find, but skip the first full minute and be forewarned, there is minor profanity.)
— Comments  —
TK writes:
I admire you and have a tremendous amount of respect for you. I think you’re one of the greatest minds on the Internet. I’ve learned a lot from your website, but I find myself trying to understand all of this “false flag” and “hoax” stuff coming from you these days. I’m sincerely trying to understand. I click on links and go down rabbit holes, but I’m unimpressed, and I see nothing that moves me to believe that there is this huge conspiracy. I admit people are not acting normal in these videos, but people don’t act normal these days. These witnesses find themselves being celebrities almost, and they start acting like it. Yes, weird and inappropriate, but it doesn’t make it a conspiracy. A successful conspiracy is crushed from the start, by the inability of a lot of people to be able to keep a secret. Tough to pull off. Merry Christmas to you and yours.
Laura writes:
Thank you for your confidence in me. Or your partial confidence. : – )
Just to clarify, I don’t base my skepticism of any of these recent shootings and terror attacks solely on the lack of grief and evident trauma in the survivors interviewed. That’s just a tip off, as it was in the Sandy Hook event, which was apparently a FEMA drill gone live.
As for Paris, there are a whole lot of disturbing things that don’t add up that I have mentioned before. They include the incompetence of suicide bombers who managed to blow themselves up without leaving any of the normal wreckage of suicide bombs. They were so dumb they left a pristine passport and a fully loaded cellphone behind and yet they were smart enough to elude detection despite being on terror watch lists and despite some of the strictest gun control laws in the free world. In one of the cafes, a suicide bomb did not even disturb the coffee cups on the table nearby. There was also the lack of cell phone video footage of the events in the Bataclan (except for one very unconvincing clip) and the way the bodies of those who allegedly died at the Bataclan were left in heaps on the floor (according to the one photo released), in violation of all standard emergency protocol. The attackers did not exhibit the behavior of devout Muslims and the alleged “mastermind,” who did not plan his escape, was seen drinking alcohol in a Paris cafe shortly after the attacks. The fact that he was not only killed, but ripped to pieces in the subsequent police raid is also alarming. Not much chance of learning too much more about him.
And then, of course, we have the almost instantaneous rush to proclaim who the attackers were and a call for military action in Syria before any of the bodies were buried.
Does that mean no one died in Paris? No, it does not. A false flag event may involve part reality and part make-believe. Some of it may be real, and some of it staged, or facilitated. Or, of course, the whole thing could have been real. I am inclined to believe that there is much more than meets the eye here.
You seem to believe that conspiracies are not possible. History does not bear this out. Most of the world powers have run espionage rings that have evaded detection. I’m not sure what you think the major intelligence agencies do, but, I assure you, you will be stonewalled if you try to probe all of their activities.  The Manhattan Project involved the employment of 82,000 people and yet most Americans knew nothing about its activities at the time. Most people don’t need to be clued in to bring off a secret project. The people at the top need to know what’s going on. Freemasonry is a secret society that has kept much of its activities and designs hidden, while maintaining the facade of a purely humanitarian organization for those on the lower rungs. There are organizations that involve some of the most powerful people in the world that openly admit to their privacy and secrecy: the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission and the Council of Foreign Relations, for example.
Secrets require incentives. False flag events would require big bucks. The big bucks, I believe, are definitely available. It is very conceivable that actors who will probably never make a decent living would agree to participate in false flag events if they are offered, say, over $1 million each and are told that the project is for the public good. Once people are in on the hoax, they are complicit and have a personal disincentive to give the secret away. Any false flag event, to be successful, would have to involve many months, and probably years, of planning.
I think we are seeing an unprecedented form of psychological warfare, aided and abetted by the monopolistic nature of the corporate media and a small number of extremely sinister and wealthy individuals intent on bringing about world government, as well as certain aims in the Middle East, and on taking control in the midst of chaos.
Stay tuned. Given the grave possibility of war or disarmament of the public resulting from these acts, I think you should be grateful for all those unpaid Internet journalists out there who are at least researching these events. Sure, there are nuts and paranoiacs, but there are also many sane people raising legitimate concerns.
In a world as insane as ours, anything can happen.
Anita K. writes:
I have a long-time friend from Belgium who now lives in Paris. I know her from University days in Brussels decades ago.
Close friends of hers there lost a daughter in the Bataclan massacre.
Laura writes:
A reader from Paris also wrote in a previous thread that a man who worked for his company died at the Bataclan.
Thousands of people died on 9/11. They were murdered in cold blood, set on fire and pulverized. The official version of what happened that day, however, does not add up. It is false. And hundreds of thousands of people died in the wars that resulted from that heinous lie.
Laura adds:
An organized minority can never defeat a country by open warfare. It can defeat a country by psychological warfare. And financial monopolies.
This is especially possible with modern means of mind conditioning that rely on imagery and instantly transmitted information.

No comments:

Post a Comment