Fox News’ new war on truth: This is why Donald Trump and GOP field get away with lies
Stephen Colbert defined "truthiness" for lies of the Bush era. They've gone to a whole new level in 2016 race
Back in 2005, when Stephen Colbert coined the term “truthiness” on the first episode of “The Colbert Report,” he offered viewers the vocabulary they needed to describe the way that the George W. Bush administration manufactured their own truths. At the time, truthiness came to signify a betrayal of the American public and an attitude of political arrogance that led us into an unjustified war. But even more important, truthiness mattered. It made a difference. It was named “word of the year” by both Merriam Webster and the American Dialect Society.
Ten years later, as presidential candidates of both parties lie with no consequences, it all seems pretty quaint. Truthiness no longer registers as a problem, let alone an accusation of political manipulation. It’s hard to imagine nostalgia for the George Bush administration, but at least back then we had real outrage over his lies. Today we have entered the era of Truthiness 2.0. In the 2016 election cycle, politicians not only lie with impunity, they actually profit from their lies.
Now all politicians lie, stretch the truth and exaggerate to advance their position. Lying is nothing new. The new part of the story is the extent of the lying and the absence of political consequence. Angie Drobnic Holan, editor of Politfact, notes that the fact checking business is in high gear this electoral season. But the results are not encouraging. She tells us that GOP frontrunner“Donald J. Trump’s record on truth and accuracy is astonishingly poor.” Nearly three-quarters of Trump’s statements are rated false, mostly false or “pants on fire.”
Ben Carson does slightly worse. Neither candidate has had one checked statement log in as true. And while there are plenty of examples of lies from the democrats, it’s worth noting that the incidence of lying slants clearly to the right. As Chris Mooney puts it, “politicized wrongness today is clustered among Republicans, conservatives, and especially Tea Partiers.”
So how is a racist liar like Trump still a thing? And why is Carson still in the race? He even made the loony claim that the Egyptian pyramids were used to store grain! But rather than end his political career Carson’s pyramid claim might have actually helped him. What’s going on?
The answer is due, in part, to the mainstream news media and the increased power of Fox News. The folks that support Trump and Carson largely get their news from Fox News– the network that uses the trademark “fair and balanced” to hawk lies and fear. Fox News has been shown to be a major agent of disinformation. Politfact explains that they lie about 60 percent of the time. Only 10 percent of the Fox News claims they rated were true. This is why their viewers score so badly on tests of their knowledge with one study suggesting that people who watched no news of any kind scored higher on aptitude of current events than Fox News viewers.
But that’s not all of it. Fox News viewers don’t only suffer from a network that lies; they are also victims of the increasing politicization of truth. It is no longer the case that we have commonly accepted truths from which we derive our political beliefs. Now every truth is itself ideological. Truths are not drawn from evidence and fact; they are culled from deep belief systems. And while this happens across the political spectrum, it is especially true for members of the GOP.
As Mooney explains in his study of the Republican brain, we now have increasing examples of conservatives denying commonly held truths like relativity. Science is seen in some conservative quarters as fundamentally ideological, a thing that one does or does not believe in. Mooney points out that conservatives’ “willingness to deny what’s true may seem especially outrageous when it infects scientific topics like evolution or climate change. But the same thing happens with economics, with American history, and with any other factual matter where there’s something ideological—in other words, something emotional and personal—at stake.”
This of course was exactly what Colbert was diagnosing with truthiness 10 years ago. It was the manufacturing of truth and the dissemination of those truths as firmly held beliefs to a captive audience. It is as though those that live in the land of truthiness occupy a parallel universe where facts matter not at all. As Mooney puts it,“today’s conservatives have their own ‘truth,’ their own experts to spout it, and their own communication channels—newspapers, cable networks, talk radio shows, blogs, encyclopedias, think tanks, even universities—to broad- and narrowcast it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment