"If An Abundance Of Guns Makes Us Safe,
Why Isn't The United States The Safest Place In The World?"
Or, more accurately put, why is the United States the most dangerous place in "the developed world?"
What Second Amendment Evangelists Fail To Understand About Their Opposition
"Gun Cartoons and Gun Violence Bibliography"
What Second Amendment Evangelists Fail To Understand About Their Opposition
"The Only Thing That Stops A Bad Guy With A Gun Is A Good Guy With A Gun"
"The Only Thing That Stops A Bad Guy With A Gun Is A Good Guy With A Gun"
Australian Gun Control After Port Arthur Massacre Left 35 Dead
Australian Comedian Nails 2nd Amendment Evangelists
http://paxonbothhouses.
The Number Of People Who Use Guns In Self-Defense Is Negligible
Australian Comedian Nails 2nd Amendment Evangelists
http://paxonbothhouses.
http://paxonbothhouses.
The Number Of People Who Use Guns In Self-Defense Is Negligible
Handguns At Home And The Scourge Of Suicide Among Young People
Handguns At Home And The Scourge Of Suicide Among Young People
Mom Killed By 2 Year Old Child Described As "Responsible." NOT!
http://paxonbothhouses.
One Heartbroken Mother's Plea To Other Parents: Ask If There's A Gun In The House
One Heartbroken Mother's Plea To Other Parents: Ask If There's A Gun In The House
80% Of All Firearm Deaths In 23 Industrialized Countries Occurred In The U.S.
http://paxonbothhouses.
“Toy Guns Outlawed At Republican Presidential Convention. Real Guns Allowed”
“Mediocre philosophy sells: It makes the half-literate… feel smart."
Jenny McCarthy: Poster Girl For Self-Terrorization
The Conservative Dream:
Absolute Safety vouchsafed by ubiquitous firearms.
Bombastic assertion that Reality can be made safer than God intended is the core appeal of fascism.
The Key Question
If ever more guns make America safer,
why are we not already the safest country in the the world?
Please email your answer to:
If you do not have an answer, ask yourself, "Why not?"
What Second Amendment Evangelists Fail To Understand About Their Opposition
It is an incontrovertible fact that if every citizen carries a firearm, some of those citizens will use those firearms to successfully prevent deadly (or damaging) attack by malefactors.
However, setting aside "wishful thinking," it is also incontrovertibly true that if every citizen carries a firearm, there will be far more firearm deaths than there would have been if citizens were required to undergo rigorous training and careful gun registration as prerequisites to owning a firearm.
Although it is grist for another mill, there are two different epistemologies in play: one statistical-and-scientific; the other anecdotal, with any favorable anecdotal outcome deemed sufficient reason to establish "A New Rule" even though anecdotes are almost always "exceptions to rules."
When Second Amendment Evangelists view the cartoon, "What might have happened on 9-11 if this were truly been The Land of The Free," they automatically believe -- as a faith-based obligation -- that every bullet fired "the good guys" will end up in the body of a terrorist, not the bodies of innocent passengers.
Even more to the point: anytime an evildoer "gets the drop" on "a good guy," it is overwhelmingly difficult for a good guy to "turn the tide."
"Wanting it so" (a desire conditioned by too many Super-Hero movies) has nothing to do with the factual Reality of increased carnage when everyone has access to a firearm.
If every airline passenger can "pack," then every terrorist would have a firearm and only a small percentage of citizens.
Would you, for example, take a firearm on board a plane?
Didn't think so...
Would a terrorist take a firearm on board a plane?
Duh.
Those who think ubiquitous firearms solve any of life's problems contribute to the problem - inflame the problem by magnitudes of deadliness
The possibility that well-armed citizens will perform acts of sudden, salvific heroicism once a thug with murderous intent "has already pulled his gun" is vanishingly remote.
Such wishful thinking is the product of arrested development, the vestigial puerility of children playing "cowboys and Indians," "cops and robbers," "white hats and black."
Many more innocent Americans are killed by firearms "in the home" than the piddling number of Americans saved by domestic firearm heroics.
"The Number Of People Who Use Guns In Self Defense Is Negligible"
And when, at rare intervals, such heroics do occur, they frequently result in the death of property thieves who harbor no violent intent.
I know no one who has used a gun in self-defense, but I do know someone who was killed while robbing a grocery store.
It is overwhelmingly likely that neither you -- nor anyone you know -- has successfully "defended themselves" with a firearm.
Americans refuse to heed "the numbers."
“Mediocre philosophy sells: It makes the half-literate… feel smart."
Jenny McCarthy: Poster Girl For Self-Terrorization
The Conservative Dream:
Absolute Safety vouchsafed by ubiquitous firearms.
Bombastic assertion that Reality can be made safer than God intended is the core appeal of fascism.
The Key Question
If ever more guns make America safer,
why are we not already the safest country in the the world?
Please email your answer to:
If you do not have an answer, ask yourself, "Why not?"
What Second Amendment Evangelists Fail To Understand About Their Opposition
It is an incontrovertible fact that if every citizen carries a firearm, some of those citizens will use those firearms to successfully prevent deadly (or damaging) attack by malefactors.
However, setting aside "wishful thinking," it is also incontrovertibly true that if every citizen carries a firearm, there will be far more firearm deaths than there would have been if citizens were required to undergo rigorous training and careful gun registration as prerequisites to owning a firearm.
Although it is grist for another mill, there are two different epistemologies in play: one statistical-and-scientific; the other anecdotal, with any favorable anecdotal outcome deemed sufficient reason to establish "A New Rule" even though anecdotes are almost always "exceptions to rules."
When Second Amendment Evangelists view the cartoon, "What might have happened on 9-11 if this were truly been The Land of The Free," they automatically believe -- as a faith-based obligation -- that every bullet fired "the good guys" will end up in the body of a terrorist, not the bodies of innocent passengers.
Even more to the point: anytime an evildoer "gets the drop" on "a good guy," it is overwhelmingly difficult for a good guy to "turn the tide."
"Wanting it so" (a desire conditioned by too many Super-Hero movies) has nothing to do with the factual Reality of increased carnage when everyone has access to a firearm.
If every airline passenger can "pack," then every terrorist would have a firearm and only a small percentage of citizens.
Would you, for example, take a firearm on board a plane?
Didn't think so...
Would a terrorist take a firearm on board a plane?
Duh.
Would you, for example, take a firearm on board a plane?
Didn't think so...
Would a terrorist take a firearm on board a plane?
Duh.
Those who think ubiquitous firearms solve any of life's problems contribute to the problem - inflame the problem by magnitudes of deadliness
The possibility that well-armed citizens will perform acts of sudden, salvific heroicism once a thug with murderous intent "has already pulled his gun" is vanishingly remote.
Such wishful thinking is the product of arrested development, the vestigial puerility of children playing "cowboys and Indians," "cops and robbers," "white hats and black."
Many more innocent Americans are killed by firearms "in the home" than the piddling number of Americans saved by domestic firearm heroics.
"The Number Of People Who Use Guns In Self Defense Is Negligible"
And when, at rare intervals, such heroics do occur, they frequently result in the death of property thieves who harbor no violent intent.
I know no one who has used a gun in self-defense, but I do know someone who was killed while robbing a grocery store.
It is overwhelmingly likely that neither you -- nor anyone you know -- has successfully "defended themselves" with a firearm.
Americans refuse to heed "the numbers."
Americans Think Foreign Aid Consumes One Third Of GNP.
This % Is Totally Hallucinated
If you ask every friend and associate until the day you die, the chances are virtually nil that you will come across someone (outside the military) who has repelled an aggressor with a firearm.
The belief that Americans use firearms in self-defense is mostly Middle School fantasy conjured by essentially fearful people trapped in arrested development.
I am 68 years old and have friends "on both sides of the aisle."
Yet I have never heard any of them say that a firearm saved their life.
I have never heard any of them say that they know someone who was saved by civilian use of a firearm.
And in those rare instances of "salvation-through-firearm," it remains over-archingly true that isolated anecdotes do not establish "general rules."
On the other hand, I have heard several friends say that firearms were used by family members to kill themselves and also have a friend whose neighbor's boy accidentally killed a friend by putting a bullet in his head.
Whether by accident... sudden eruption of anger... or by psychological disease... firearms in the home exact a terrifyingly high toll with correspondingly trivial benefit.
The belief that "individual heroes" will "save the day" is essentially self-ish, a subset of rugged individualism and the horrifying fear of living in All-American isolation.,
Yes, an occasional hero will "save the day."
Guns Save Lives
The Number Of People Who Use A Gun In Self-Defense Is Pretty Much Negligible
But choosing to arm an entire society only increases the cumulative carnage.
Gun Tweet In Wake Of Umpqua Slaughter
Opportunities for "gun-toting heroism" are vanishingly rare, and when they do present, they are likely to exacerbate the violence-in-progress.
Consider the following case in point.
Armed Veteran Explains Why He Didn't Confront Oregon Snhooter With His "Good Guy" Gun
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2015/10/armed-vet-at-umpqua-explains-why-he.html
The human psyche prefers "clutching at straws" to admitting that many threatening situations are simply "outside our control."
Furthermore, attempts to "control the uncontrollable" -- either by enhanced "security measures" "taken in advance" or "taken while an aggressive act is unfolding" -- do not contribute to security and routinely become risk factors in themselves.
Too much of anything - even a good thing - is too much.
Consider the flood of handguns in American homes, a deluge whose potential benefit pales alongside the actual number of American suicides and "domestic homicides" that would not have taken place except for the presence of handguns in the home.
The situation is analogous to the conservative desire to disenfranchise 11% of American voters in order to prevent several hundred cases of demonstrable voter fraud - a textbook illustration of "cutting off one's nose to spite one's face."
How Frequent Is Voter Fraud?
How Frequent Is Voter Suppression?
Voter I.D. Laws Could Disenfranchise 11% Of The Electorate
In the absence of firearms, most young people who attempt suicide do not succeed.
Keep in mind that the suicides I am focusing are not "potential threats" like an attack on your neighborhood school.
Rather, they are "done deeds" - dependable statistics year in, year out.
Needless statistics year in, year out.
Lamentably, most Americans believe that "heroic last minute intervention" will prevent criminals from perpetrating carnage -- a highly unlikely outcome -- simultaneously ignoring the actual avalanche of carnage in American homes - carnage that would not take place if ready availability of handguns in the home did not facilitate suicide.
States. In the United States, only motor vehicle crashes and cancer claim more lives among children 5–14 years old than do firearms.
If you ask every friend and associate until the day you die, the chances are virtually nil that you will come across someone (outside the military) who has repelled an aggressor with a firearm.
The belief that Americans use firearms in self-defense is mostly Middle School fantasy conjured by essentially fearful people trapped in arrested development.
I am 68 years old and have friends "on both sides of the aisle."
Yet I have never heard any of them say that a firearm saved their life.
I have never heard any of them say that they know someone who was saved by civilian use of a firearm.
And in those rare instances of "salvation-through-firearm," it remains over-archingly true that isolated anecdotes do not establish "general rules."
Yet I have never heard any of them say that a firearm saved their life.
I have never heard any of them say that they know someone who was saved by civilian use of a firearm.
And in those rare instances of "salvation-through-firearm," it remains over-archingly true that isolated anecdotes do not establish "general rules."
On the other hand, I have heard several friends say that firearms were used by family members to kill themselves and also have a friend whose neighbor's boy accidentally killed a friend by putting a bullet in his head.
Whether by accident... sudden eruption of anger... or by psychological disease... firearms in the home exact a terrifyingly high toll with correspondingly trivial benefit.
The belief that "individual heroes" will "save the day" is essentially self-ish, a subset of rugged individualism and the horrifying fear of living in All-American isolation.,
Yes, an occasional hero will "save the day."
Guns Save Lives
The Number Of People Who Use A Gun In Self-Defense Is Pretty Much Negligible
But choosing to arm an entire society only increases the cumulative carnage.
Gun Tweet In Wake Of Umpqua Slaughter
Opportunities for "gun-toting heroism" are vanishingly rare, and when they do present, they are likely to exacerbate the violence-in-progress.
Consider the following case in point.
Armed Veteran Explains Why He Didn't Confront Oregon Snhooter With His "Good Guy" Gun
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2015/10/armed-vet-at-umpqua-explains-why-he.html
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2015/10/armed-vet-at-umpqua-explains-why-he.html
The human psyche prefers "clutching at straws" to admitting that many threatening situations are simply "outside our control."
Furthermore, attempts to "control the uncontrollable" -- either by enhanced "security measures" "taken in advance" or "taken while an aggressive act is unfolding" -- do not contribute to security and routinely become risk factors in themselves.
Too much of anything - even a good thing - is too much.
Too much of anything - even a good thing - is too much.
Consider the flood of handguns in American homes, a deluge whose potential benefit pales alongside the actual number of American suicides and "domestic homicides" that would not have taken place except for the presence of handguns in the home.
The situation is analogous to the conservative desire to disenfranchise 11% of American voters in order to prevent several hundred cases of demonstrable voter fraud - a textbook illustration of "cutting off one's nose to spite one's face."
How Frequent Is Voter Fraud?
How Frequent Is Voter Suppression?
Voter I.D. Laws Could Disenfranchise 11% Of The Electorate
In the absence of firearms, most young people who attempt suicide do not succeed.
Keep in mind that the suicides I am focusing are not "potential threats" like an attack on your neighborhood school.
Rather, they are "done deeds" - dependable statistics year in, year out.
Needless statistics year in, year out.
Rather, they are "done deeds" - dependable statistics year in, year out.
Needless statistics year in, year out.
Lamentably, most Americans believe that "heroic last minute intervention" will prevent criminals from perpetrating carnage -- a highly unlikely outcome -- simultaneously ignoring the actual avalanche of carnage in American homes - carnage that would not take place if ready availability of handguns in the home did not facilitate suicide.
States. In the United States, only motor vehicle crashes and cancer claim more lives among children 5–14 years old than do firearms.
For young Americans, 15-24, suicide (60% by firearm) is the third leading cause of death
Firearm injury and death charts for the U.S. (and the world) are available at the following University of Pennsylvania
Firearm injury and death charts for the U.S. (and the world) are available at the following University of Pennsylvania
Suicide in the Home in Relation to Gun OwnershipArthur L. Kellermann, MD, MPH; Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH; et al, The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 327, No. 7, August 13, 1992, pp. 467-472. Key Statistic: The presence of one or more guns in the home increases the risk of suicide in the home nearly five times. http://www.vpc.org/studies/whersuic
"Gun Cartoons and Gun Violence Bibliography"
Americans Are 9 Times More Likely To Be Killed By A Policeman Than A Terrorist
The make-believe heroicism that afflicts Second Amendment Evangelists recalls the bizarre supposition that the violent overthrow of Saddam Hussein (Ronald Reagan's geopolitical ally) would "make the world safe for democracy."
"Bush's Toxic Legacy In Iraq"
George Will Documents Reagan's Collusion With Saddam Hussein's Use Of Chemical Weapons
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2013/09/george-will-documents-ronald-reagans.html
"If An Abundance Of Guns Makes Us Safe,
Why Isn't The United States The Safest Place In The World?"
Americans Are 9 Times More Likely To Be Killed By A Policeman Than A Terrorist
The make-believe heroicism that afflicts Second Amendment Evangelists recalls the bizarre supposition that the violent overthrow of Saddam Hussein (Ronald Reagan's geopolitical ally) would "make the world safe for democracy."
"Bush's Toxic Legacy In Iraq"
George Will Documents Reagan's Collusion With Saddam Hussein's Use Of Chemical Weapons
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2013/09/george-will-documents-ronald-reagans.html
"If An Abundance Of Guns Makes Us Safe,
Why Isn't The United States The Safest Place In The World?"
The American Party: Know Nothing Nativism
http://paxonbothhouses.
Like the Pharisees, the Know Nothings are always with us.
Like the Pharisees, the Know Nothings are always with us.
When well-trained, authorized security people have guns, they often contribute to safety.
No one disputes this fact (although paranoid 2nd Amendment Evangelists believe that "liberals" do).
What Second Amendment Evangelists Fail To Understand About Their Opposition
However, when everyone has their hands on guns, safety is negatively impacted while rates of homicide and suicide (especially among young people) soar.
Conservatives are unusually animated by individual anecdotes that tell tales of "gun salvation" but are unusually ignorant of the statistical fact that homicide and suicide rates go stratospheric in societies that are supersaturated with guns.
The Full Scoop
Conservatives believe that it is always better to have a last-gasp chance to save oneself by outshooting a criminal who already "has the drop" despite the demonstrable fact that far more people will die by universal gun availability than the number whose lives are saved by unregulated gun availability.
Why does the word "regulated" appear in The Second Amendment?
It is increasingly clear that people - particularly conservatives - are not interested in facts as they relate to The Common Good but in heroic last-minute measures that are easily fantasized but rarely implemented.
At bedrock, conservatives are comforted by self-serving fiction whereas liberals are fortified by facts, including facts that are statistically validated.
If you disagree that a deluge of firearms is responsible for social havoc, ask yourself: "How many families do I know whose members have actually used guns to defend themselves from criminal attack? And how many families do I know whose members have used guns to commit suicide or to commit a crime?"
I know one person who claims to have used a gun in self-defense, although it is not clear whether the stranger who fled from her front door (when he saw the gun she was brandishing) was in fact a criminal.
On the other hand, I do know several people who, using firearms, have committed suicide or accidentally killed others - in one instance, a boy who killed his young brother.
No comments:
Post a Comment