Alan: A clinician would say that Trump "lacks insight."
In his conception of federal judge Gonzalo Curiel, Devious Donald fails to see that it is he, the manipulative billionaire, who is biased and -- in the most rudimentary of all psychological "twists" -- Trump projects his own bias onto the judge.
This determination to project his own tawdry tendencies onto others is the cornerstone of Trump's twisted psyche.
Best Pax Posts On Psychological Projection And "The Shadow"
It must also be said that conservatives tend to "hold science in contempt" in order to dodge those findings which, if taken to heart, would oblige total transformation of their entire world view.
Chief among these findings are evolution, anthropogenic global warming and the intrinsic dignity of diverse cultures.
"The Danger Of Science Denial"
TED Talk by Michael Specter
Modernity's most egregious example of "projected shadow" was Hitler's conviction of impeccable personal and racial purity, a conviction which displaced his own unacknowledged evil onto "the dirty Jews."
The more perfect (and puritanical) Hitler's conception of self and his fellow Aryans, the more The Final Solution morphed from a political tactic to a "moral obligation."
Best Pax Posts On Psychological Projection And "The Shadow"
It must also be said that conservatives tend to "hold science in contempt" in order to dodge those findings which, if taken to heart, would oblige total transformation of their entire world view.
Chief among these findings are evolution, anthropogenic global warming and the intrinsic dignity of diverse cultures.
Chief among these findings are evolution, anthropogenic global warming and the intrinsic dignity of diverse cultures.
"The Danger Of Science Denial"
TED Talk by Michael Specter
Modernity's most egregious example of "projected shadow" was Hitler's conviction of impeccable personal and racial purity, a conviction which displaced his own unacknowledged evil onto "the dirty Jews."
The more perfect (and puritanical) Hitler's conception of self and his fellow Aryans, the more The Final Solution morphed from a political tactic to a "moral obligation."
Trump Presses Case That 'Mexican' Judge Curiel Is Biased Against Him
Donald Trump is intensifying his attacks on the federal judge presiding over fraud lawsuits against Trump University. On Friday the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, dismissing criticism from legal experts on the right and left, pressed his case against U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, saying the Indiana-born judge is biased against him because "he's a Mexican. We're building a wall between here and Mexico."
Trump made the remarks, and others like it, repeatedly, in interviews with CNN and The Wall Street Journal, referring to Judge Curiel variously as "of Mexican heritage" or just "Mexican." But the message was always the same, that the judge had what Trump called "a conflict" because of his ethnicity.
At a rally in San Diego last week, Trump characterized the judge as "a hater of Donald Trump, a hater. He's a hater." And "they ought to look into Judge Curiel."
In public, Trump has called repeatedly for the judge to recuse himself, but his lawyers in fact have not made any such request.
That is undoubtedly because court precedents are unanimous in holding that race, ethnicity, gender, religion and sexual orientation are not themselves grounds for disqualifying a judge. If they were, legal ethicists observe, the legal system would fall into chaos because no judge would be free from taint. The five Supreme Court justices who are Catholic could not rule on a case in which the Catholic church participated, but neither could the other justices who are not Catholic.
Moreover, while Trump is free to say anything he wants about the judge, the lawyers in the case are bound by the professional rules of conduct and could be sanctioned for making such charges about Curiel without actual evidence of bias.
Legal ethics expert Stephen Gillers notes in addition that litigants may not wait to seek a judge's disqualification; they must move to recuse the judge as soon as they know there is a conflict.
Trump's lawyers, from the prestigious O'Melveny & Myers firm, however, have not done that. Indeed, some observers argue that the judge did the candidate a big favor by postponing the trial in the case until after the election. And Trump did not become bellicose about Curiel until the judge, at the request of news organizations, ordered the unsealing of documents in the case— documents that have proved embarrassing for the GOP presumptive nominee.
"This is not really about rebutting accusations that Trump University defrauded its students," said NYU's Gillers. Rather, it is a kind of dog whistle to supporters, "a way to keep the subject of illegal Mexican immigration on the front page."
Judge Curiel, appointed to the federal bench by President Obama, was born in Indiana, the son of Mexican-American immigrants. He served for 17 years as a federal prosecutor in California, rising to chief of narcotics enforcement in the southern district. In 1997 he was believed to be the target of an assassination attempt from a Mexican drug cartel, was put under 24-hour watch by the U.S. Marshall Service for a year, was moved to a military base and eventually to Justice Department headquarters in Washington, D.C.
The judge's friend, former U.S. Attorney Gregory Vega, scoffs at the notion that Curiel will be in any way influenced by Trump's remarks. "What's so ironic is that Gonzalo gave so many years of his life to protecting America from drug traffickers," Vega told Yahoo News. "He had a credible threat on his life. Do you really think being called [names] by Mr. Trump is going to frighten him? How silly."
No comments:
Post a Comment