In a diary posted here: http://www.dailykos.com/...  I covered how this move sought to shut small towns out of negotiating for better services for their residents and to preserve their own tax base.
Now, Chanute Kansas looks to turn on it's fiber network and finds itself with the ghoul in the room of AT&T, who looks to shut down their service.. you see, it's hard to sell 6Mbps DSL internet for significantly more with data caps when someone else is offering 1Gbps with no caps.
It’s true that a 1Gbps fiber service would definitely impact AT&T’s business operations in the area and likely for the very worse. Ars Technica points out that Chanute would charge citizens just $40 per month for its 1Gbps service, which is a mere $5 more than the six-month teaser rate for AT&T’s 6Mbps service. What’s more, AT&T’s plan includes a hard data cap of 150GB per month and going over that limit will set you back by an additional $10 per month
http://www.kansas.com/...
After beating back a legislative effort to stop them, city leaders in Chanute now face another state government hurdle in their effort to extend ultra-high-speed fiber broadband to residents’ homes and businesses.
The service the city is planning has a download speed of 1 gigabit and is projected to cost $40 a month for city residents. That’s 14 times faster and 60 percent cheaper than the fastest Internet service that Chanute residents can get now.
Chanute, like many small communities is trying to look after their future by giving residents and businesses a reason to stay in a program that is likely to pay for itself within 3 years.   The Chanute City government contends that this would likely help attract and keep residents - a nice way to hold their tax base in place.
Now, however, AT&T will ask for the state to intervene and to keep the residents locked out of high speed network services.
Chanute City officials, however, feel confident that in the end the state commission will provide them the go ahead to make the offer.
Protests in the state house, letter writing and support to kill the prior attempt to stop Chanute were critical in making sure that rural communities were able to stand up to the resources that the internet services put against them.
Can a rural Kansas town set the standard for how internet services could be offered to residents?