Share
Caril Ann Fugate following her arrest in
1958 at age 14.
In my mid-sixties
now, the sharp breach between vengeful "Christians" and forgiving
Christians is ever clearer.
Not only are
vengeful "Christians" dangerous to The
Body Politic but they are
singularly dangerous to themselves, convinced that retaliation is the best
guarantee of salvation.
Vindictive
"Christians" (and an identifiable sub-population of "Armageddon
Cheerleaders") live in cages of their own making, saturated in spiteful
belief, as confident of their personal salvation as they are sure that others
(many of whom they can call by name) are destined for eternal damnation.
(Barack HUSSEIN Obama figures high on this list.)
It is difficult
to imagine these bilious people escaping the seductive traps they have set
themselves. May the following article create enough cognitive dissonance
to crumble the crippling certainties that afflict these "good
Christians."
Charles
Starkweather
***
June 12, 2012
The Des Moines Register this week detailed the story of Caril Ann Fugate, a 14-year-old girl whose 18-year-old boyfriend involved her in a sensationalized series of crimes in Nebraska in 1958. Despite being sentenced to life in prison, Caril became a model prisoner and her sentence was commuted. She was released after serving 18 years, worked as a medical aide, has never run afoul of the law, and is now a married retiree.
Caril Fugate in 1972.
Caril Fugate's story of rehabilitation and redemption demonstrates children's enormous potential for growth and change. In abolishing the death penalty for children, the United States Supreme Court observed in Roper v. Simmons that, because children are still developing, "it is less supportable to conclude that even a heinous crime committed by a juvenile is evidence of irretrievably depraved character.” The Court struck down life-without-parole sentences for children convicted of nonhomicide offenses in 2010.
In two cases now pending before the Supreme Court, Jackson v. Hobbs and Miller v. Alabama, EJI is arguing that sentencing a child to life imprisonment without parole is unconstitutional because children are not yet developed and have a greater capacity for reform. Because children will change as they grow up, and almost all will grow out of criminal behavior, EJI argues that sentencers cannot reliably make a judgment at the outset that a young offender is never fit to reenter society.
The Supreme Court will decide Miller and Jackson within the next few weeks.
No comments:
Post a Comment