Abigail Adams
Wikiquote
Here is The Thinking Housewife's most recent post.
I have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA which side of the "fence" she comes down on.
Is she criticizing women whose lives were forever changed by the American Revolution?
Or is she cheering them on?
Please send me your "take."
The Woman of ’76
July 31, 2018
Abigail Adams
“THE PECULIAR FORMS of uneasiness in the American woman of today come naturally enough from the Revolution of 1776. That movement upset theoretically everything which had been expected of her before. Theoretically, it broke down the division fences which had kept her in sets and groups. She was no longer to be a woman of class; she was a woman of the people. This was striking at the very underpinning of femininity, as the world knew it. Theoretically, too, her ears were no longer to be closed to all ideas save those of her church or party,— a new thing, freedom of speech, was abroad,— her lips were opened with man’s. Moreover, her business of family building was modified, as well as her attitude towards life. The necessity of all women educating themselves that they might be able to educate their children was an obligation on the face of the new undertaking. Another revolutionary duty put upon her was— paying her way. There can be no real democracy where there is parasitism. She must achieve conscious independence whether in or out of the family. Unquestionably there came with the Revolution a vision of a new woman— a woman from whom all of the willfulness and frivolity and helplessness of the “Lady” of the old régime should be stripped, while all her qualities of gentleness and charm should be preserved. The old-world lady was to be merged into a woman strong, capable, severely beautiful, a creature who had all of the virtues and none of the follies of femininity.
It was strong yeast they put into the pot in ’76.
A fresh leaven in a people can never be distributed evenly. Moreover, the mass to which it is applied is never homogeneous. There are spots so hard no yeast can move them; there are others so light the yeast burns them out. Taken as a whole, the change is labored and painful. So our new notions worked on women. There were groups which resented and refused them, became reactionary at the stating of them. There were those which grew grave and troubled under them, shrinking from the portentous upheaval they felt in their touch, yet sensing that they must be accepted. There were still others where the notion frothed and foamed, turning up unexpected ideas, revealing depths of dissatisfaction, of desire, of unsuspected powers in woman that startled the staid old world. It was in these quarters that there was produced the uneasy woman typical of the day.
Her ferment went to the bottom of things this time. Not since the age of the Amazon had a body of women broken more utterly with things as they are. And like the Amazon, the revolt was against man and his pretensions.”
—- Ida M. Tarbell, The Business of Being a Woman, The Macmillan Company, 1921 (Kindle Edition, locations 125-129).
http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2018/07/the-woman-of-76/
Laura pretends to be dead-set against all revolution, arising as it does from "The Satanic Left."
That said, she is a dead-set right-wing "revolutionary" insofar as she wants to overturn the existing order en route to the 19th century, if not the 13th.
Paz contigo,
Alan
No comments:
Post a Comment