Pages

Monday, April 30, 2012

Romney wishes Robert Bork "were already on the Court."




Whatever people think of Obama - and I really like the guy even though I abhor some of the stuff he's done - let's remember: "It's about The Supreme Court."

Romney knows what the priorities are: "The key thing the president is going to do... it's going to be appointing Supreme Court and Justices throughout the judicial system." 

Furthermore, Mitt wishes Robert Bork "were already on the Court." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork

Pax on both houses,

Alan
***

Excerpt: 

Judge Bork Means Business: the Case of the Sterilized Women Employees

If you don't think Bork means all this, go back and look at his bleak record as a Judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Take just one Bork opinion that became a crucial point of discussion in the hearings over his failed 1987 Supreme Court nomination. In a 1984 case called Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union v. American Cyanamid Co., Bork found that the Occupational Safety and Health Act did not protect women at work in a manufacturing plant from a company policy that forced them to be sterilized -- or else lose their jobs -- because of high levels of lead in the air. The Secretary of Labor had decided that the Act's requirement that employers must provide workers "employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards" meant that American Cynamid had to "fix the workplace" through industrial clean-up rather than "fix the employees" by sterilizing or removing all women workers of child-bearing age. But Bork strongly disagreed. He wrote an opinion for his colleagues apparently endorsing the view that other clean-up measures were not necessary or possible and that the sterilization policy was, in any event, a "realistic and clearly lawful" way to prevent harm to the women's fetuses. Because the company's "fetus protection policy" took place by virtue of sterilization in a hospital -- outside of the physical workplace -- the plain terms of the Act simply did not apply, according to Bork. Thus, as Public Citizen put it, "an employer may require its female workers to be sterilized in order to reduce employer liability for harm to the potential children." 
***

American University Law Prof, MD State Senator, People For the American Way Senior Fellow

No comments:

Post a Comment