Alan: There is a screw loose on the conservative "side of the aisle."
What the Clintons may (or may not) be responsible for in their Foundation work (which on balance seems to do quite good work) inhabits a separate Universe from the activities of Trump (and his employees) as public servants in The White House.
Those who think there is even approximate "equivalency" between the The Oval Office and The Clinton Foundation are as unhinged as The Deplorable One.
I encourage you to read about The Clinton Foundation.
The Clinton Foundation
Wikipedia
Excerpt:
Charity review sources
In March, 2015, the charity watchdog group Charity Navigator added the Clinton Foundation to a watch list (a designation meant to warn donors that questions have been raised about an entity's practices), after several news organizations raised questions over donations from corporations and foreign governments. It removed the foundation from its watch list in late December of that year.[72] In September 2016, it gave it its highest possible rating, four out of four stars, after its customary review of the Foundation's financial records and tax statements.[73] A different charity monitor, CharityWatch, said that 88% of the foundation's money goes toward its charitable mission and gave the foundation an A rating for 2016. In 2015, based on revenue of $223 million and an expense ratio of 12% the foundation spent in excess of $26 million to complete its mission.[74]
No comments:
Post a Comment