Patriarchy and Women's Roles in Ancient Israel

Dear Fred,

Thanks for your emails.

I do not approve the emergence of women as a political force just because "everyone else is doing it."

I approve gender parity because it restores equilibrium after millennia of male domination.

All dyadic poles are intended to be of equal strength.

We have paid lip service to the concept of equilibrium but corresponding realities (as they relate to masculine/feminine, yin/yang, lingam/yoni, tai chi) have become repositories of radical disequilibrium. 

Time out of mind, men have dominated women -- often brutally so.

Why? Because they have enough upper body strength to enforce dominance-submission hierarchies with men in "every" dominant role.

The following descriptions of women -- from Thomas Aquinas and his teacher, St. Albert the Great -- were provided on a webpage from Spring Hill College, the oldest Catholic College in the South.

St. Albert the Great, Quaestiones super de animalibus XV q. 11
"Woman is less qualified [than man] for moral behavior. For the woman contains more liquid than the man, and it is a property of liquid to take things up easily and to hold onto them poorly. Liquids are easily moved, hence women are inconstant and curious. When a woman has relations with a man, she would like, as much as possible, to be lying with another man at the same time. Woman knows nothing of fidelity. Believe me, if you give her your trust, you will be disappointed. Trust an experienced teacher. For this reason prudent men share their plans and actions least of all with their wives. Woman is a misbegotten man and has a faulty and defective nature in comparison with his. Therefore she is unsure in herself. What she herself cannot get, she seeks to obtain through lying and diabolical deceptions. And so, to put it briefly, one must be on one's guard with every woman, as if she were a poisonous snake and the horned devil.... In evil and perverse doings woman is cleverer, that is, slyer, than man. Her feelings drive woman toward every evil, just as reason impels man toward all good."

St. Albert the Great, Quaestiones super de animalibus XVIII q.1
"The north wind strengthens the power, and the south wind weakens it... The north wind leads to the generation of males, the south wind to the generation of females, because the north wind is pure and dries out the exhalations and stimulates the natural force. But the south wind is moist and heavy with rain."

St. Thomas Aquinas, In I Cor. Ch.11, lectio 2
"By taking the vow of virginity or of consecrated widowhood and thus being betrothed to Christ, they (women) are raised to the dignity of men, through which they are freed from subordination to men and are immediately united with Christ."

St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica I q. 92 a. 1
"Woman is defective and misbegotten, for the active force in the male seed tends to the production of a perfect likeness in the masculine sex; while the production of woman comes from defect in the active force or from some material indisposition, or even from some external influence, such as that of a south wind, which is moist."

St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica I q.92 a.1 reply 2
"Good order would have been wanting in the human family if some were not governed by others wiser than themselves. So by such a kind of subjection woman is naturally subject to man, because in man the discretion of reason predominates."

St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica II-II q.149 a.4
"Sobriety is most requisite in the young and in women, because concupiscence of pleasure thrives in theyoung on account of the heat of youth, while in women there is not sufficient strength of mind to resist concupiscence."

St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica II-II q.70 a.3
"The reliability of a person's evidence is weakened, sometimes indeed on account of some fault of his...; sometimes, without any fault on his part, and this owing either to a defect in the reason, as in the case of children, imbeciles and women, or to personal feeling..."

***

The patriarchal impulse has "stacked the deck" for millennia. 

"Things" happen "in the fullness of time" and it is now time to establish gender balance. (This balance should not partake of legally-enforced mathematical parity, but rather permit people of both sexes to express their personal genius wherever such expression may lead.)

There are many reasons given for the crucifixion of the Nazarene. 

I have long been partial to the conviction that Jesus was killed because he spurned purificatory norms (and rites) that had become ancient Jewish obsessions.

I am beginning to wonder if Jesus' fundamental threat to the established Jewish order was his brazen determination to conduct egalitarian relationships with women.

Yeshua's full engagement of women was a fundamental aspiration of his mission, a persistent thrust antipodal to the the established mores of Semitic Antiquity.

Jesus and The Woman at the Well
A strange man and a strange woman meet in a remote place.
The patriarchs would be livid. Their instinct would be to kill him.

It would be the "honorable" thing to do.

Yeshua's relationships with "free" women was radically divergent from prevailing Jewish norms - both social and religious.

"From the Second Temple period, women were not allowed to testify in court trials. They could not go out in public, or talk to strangers. When outside of their homes, they were to be doubly veiled. "They had become second-class Jews, excluded from the worship and teaching of God, with status scarcely above that of slaves.""

***

Alan: Although the following article is "politically correct," it is also a necesary antidote to the gender nonsense set forth by Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas 1200 years after Christ. (The following view from PBS Frontline is perhaps more palatable. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/first/women.html In either event, Yeshua's mission was, emphatically, not about the maintenance of traditional patriarchy.)

The status of women in the Christian Gospels

Women in ancient Israel:

Women's status and freedoms were severely limited by Jewish law and custom in ancient Israel, as they were in essentially all other cultures at the time. Generally speaking:

	most were restricted to roles of little or no authority,
	they were largely confined to their father's or husband's home,
	they were considered to be inferior to men, and under the authority of men -- either their father before marriage, or their husband afterwards.

From the Second Temple period, women were not allowed to testify in court trials. They could not go out in public, or talk to strangers. When outside of their homes, they were to be doubly veiled. "They had become second-class Jews, excluded from the worship and teaching of God, with status scarcely above that of slaves." ₁ Their position in society was defined in the Hebrew Scriptures and in the interpretation of those scriptures. More details.

Change in status: Jesus' radical treatment of women:
Christ overthrew many centuries of Jewish law and custom. He consistently treated women and men as equals. He violated numerous Old Testament regulations, which specified gender inequality. He refused to follow the behavioral rules established by the three main Jewish religious groups of the day: the Essenes, Pharisees and Sadducees. "The actions of Jesus of Nazareth towards women were therefore revolutionary." ₁ Some examples are:

	He ignored ritual impurity laws: Mark 5:25-34 describes Jesus' cure of a woman who suffered from menstrual bleeding for 12 years. In Judean society of the day, it was a major transgression for a man to talk to a woman other than his wife or children.
	He talked to foreign women: John 4:7 to 5:30 describes Jesus' conversation with a woman of Samaria. She was doubly ritually unclean since she was both a foreigner and a woman. Men were not allowed to talk to women, except within their own families. Jesus also helped a Canaanite woman, another foreigner, in Matthew 15:22-28. Although he described non-Jews as "dogs", he was willing to talk to her, and is recorded as having cured her daughter of demon-possession.
	He taught women students: Jewish tradition at the time was to not allow women to be taught. Rabbi Eliezer wrote in the 1st century CE:"Rather should the words of the Torah be burned than entrusted to a woman...Whoever teaches his daughter the Torah is like one who teaches her obscenity." 5  Jesus overthrew centuries of tradition. In Luke 10:38-42, he taught Mary, sister of Martha.
	He used terminology which treated women as equal to men: Luke 13:16 describes how he cured a woman from an indwelling Satanic spirit. He called her a daughter of Abraham, thus implying that she had equal status with sons of Abraham. "The expression 'son of Abraham' was commonly used to respectfully refer to a Jew, but 'daughter of Abraham', was an unknown parallel phrase...It occurs nowhere else in the Bible." 4 It seems to be a designation created by Jesus.   Luke 7:35 to 8:50 describes how Jesus' forgave a woman's sins. He refers to women and men (i.e. "all" people) as children of wisdom.
	He accepted women in his inner circle: Luke 8:1-3 describes the inner circle of Jesus' followers: 12 male disciples and an unspecified number female supporters (Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Susanna and "many others.") It would appear that about half of his closest followers were women.
	He appeared first to one or more women after his resurrection: Matthew 28:9-10 describes how Mary Magdalene and "the other Mary" were the first followers of Jesus to meet him after his resurrection. (However, this account is contradicted by passages in 1 Corinthians, which state that the first person to see Jesus was Cleopas, Peter or all of the disciples.)
	Mostly women were present at Jesus' execution: Matthew 27:55-56 and Mark 15:40-41 describe many women who followed Jesus from Galilee and were present at his crucifixion. The men had fled from the scene. (John 19:25-27 contradicts this; the author describes John as being present with the women.)
	He told parallel male/female stories: The author of the Gospel of Luke and of Acts shows many parallel episodes: one relating to a woman, the other to a man. For example: Simeon and Hannah in Luke 2:25-38 Widow of Sarepta and Naaman in Luke 4:25-38 Healing of a man possessed by a demon and the healing of the mother of Peter's wife, starting in Luke 4:31 The woman who had lived a sinful life and Simon, starting in Luke 7:36 A man and woman sleeping together in Luke 17:34 Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5:1-11 Dionysius and Damaris in Acts 17:34 Lydia and the jailer's conversion in Acts 16:14-34 The book "Women in the Earliest Churches" lists 9 additional parallels. 3 Author Ben Witherington III quotes H. Flender: "Luke expresses by this arrangement that man and woman stand together and side by side before God. They are equal in honor and grace; they are endowed with the same gifts and have the same responsibilities." Some theologians have speculated that the author of the Gospel of Luke might well have been a woman.

He expressed concern for widows: Jesus repeated the importance of supporting widows throughout his ministry. The Gospel of Luke alone contains 6 references to widows: (Luke 2:36, 4:26, 7:11, 18:1, 20:47 and 21:1)

Divorce: In Jesus' time, a man could divorce his wife, but the wife had no right to divorce her husband. This practice is supported by seven  references in the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) in which a husband can unilaterally give his wife a bill of divorce. There were no references to a woman giving her husband such a bill. In Mark 10:11-12, Jesus overthrows this tradition and states that neither spouse can divorce the other; he treats the wife and husband equally.

Passages where Jesus apparently does not call for equality of the sexes:

There are two passages where Jesus deviates from his usual practice of treating women equally:

Selection of his disciples: There are three conflicting lists of the names of the 12 disciples that Jesus selected. In all cases, the disciples were male. He later selected a total of 70 disciples; the gender makeup of the latter group was not recorded. Some might well have been female. In his defense, he might have chosen only single people because he wanted disciples who were unencumbered with spouses. In first century CE Jewish culture, unmarried women traveling with men would cause so much criticism that the reception of Jesus' teaching by the public might have been impossible.

Levirate Marriage: In Mark 12:18-27 Jesus answered a question posed by some Sadducees. They described a woman who was widowed and required to marry her brother-in-law. This was called a "Levirate" marriage. Their first-born son will be considered to be the son of the deceased husband. In this case, they imagined that seven brothers-in-law married her in succession without having a son. Jesus could have used the opportunity to preach on the unfairness and sexism implicit in this requirement of Jewish law (from Deuteronomy 25:5-10). After all, the woman was not allowed to refuse to marry any of the brothers, even if she despised some of them. Levirate marriage often involved serial rape. But Jesus is not recorded as having condemned the practice. Again in his defense, he might have criticized Levirate marriage at the time, but his words might not have been considered significant the Gospel writers who thus might not have recorded Jesus' comments. Alternately, they might have recorded Jesus criticism of Levirate marriage in the original, autograph copy of their Gospels. However, a later copyist might have deleted the passage. As archeologists are fond of saying: "Absence of proof is not proof of absence."

There is a passage in the Christian Scriptures (New Testament) where Jesus is reported as having insulted a woman. He referred to her as a dog, implying that she was sub-human.
Interpreting Matthew 15:22-28 literally:

She was described as a Canaanite. However, Mark 7:25-30 identified her as Greek/Syrophenician. She had pleaded with Jesus to cure her daughter who she believed was possessed by a demon. He first ignored her, but then explained that he was sent only to bring the Gospel to the Jews, not to the Gentiles such as she. Jesus cruelly replied to the desperate mother that it was not right for him "to take the children's bread and to cast it to dogs." i.e. it is not appropriate to take the Gospel, which was intended only for the Jews, and offer it to Gentiles as well -- here described as sub-humans. (Observant Jews in the 1^st century CE often referred to all Gentiles contemptuously as "dogs.") She quipped back to Jesus that even the "dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table." Jesus relented and -- because of the mother's faith -- remotely cured the daughter of demonic possession.

Jesus' response to the woman was uncharacteristic for him. As noted above, he often deviated greatly from Jewish tradition at the time and treated women as equals. Here, he appears to reject the woman because of her race or her culture of origin, not because of her gender. Another possibility is that he responded to her in a tongue-in-cheek fashion rather out of anger or callousness.

Treatment of Mary Magdalene:

In Matthew 28:1-7, after Jesus' resurrection, "Mary Magdalene and the other Mary" receive the first apostolic commission of any person -- to tell the good news of the  resurrection to the disciples. This is reinforced by Jesus' appearance before the two women. The two Marys were thus the first apostles.
Some of the gospels and epistles from the very early history of Christianity that never made their way into the official canon described Mary Magdalene and other women as holding leadership positions within the movement.
The Nazarene Way of Essenic Studies comments:

"Mary Magdalene is mentioned in the Gospels as being among the women of Galilee who followed Jesus and His disciples. She was present at His Crucifixion and Burial, and went to the tomb on Easter Sunday to anoint His body. She was the first to see the Risen Lord, and to announce His Resurrection to the apostles. Accordingly, she is referred to in early Christian writings as 'the apostle to the apostles'." ₈

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

1. B.M. Metzger & M.D. Coogan, "The Oxford Companion to the Bible", Oxford University Press, New York, NY, (1993), P. 806 to 818
2. Christians for Biblical Equality are an Evangelical Christian group, which opposes the vast majority of conservative Christian denominations by promoting gender equality. Their essay: "Statement On Men, Women and Biblical Equality" is at:http://www.cbeinternational.org
3. Ben Witherington III, "Women in the Earliest Churches", Cambridge University Press, (Reprinted 1991), Page 129. Read reviews or order this book safely from Amazon.com online book store.
4. Frank Daniels, "The Role of Woman in the Church." part of the Religious Heresy Page at: http://www.scs.unr.edu/.
5. Rabbi Eliezer, "Mishnah, Sotah 3:4"
6. Ross Shepard Kraemer, Mary Rose D'Angelo, "Women and Christian Origins," Oxford University Press, (1999). Read reviews or order this book.
7. Karen L. King, "The Gospel of Mary of Magdala: Jesus and the First Woman Apostle," Polebridge Press, (2003). Read reviews or order this book.
8. "Saint Mary Magdalene: 'The Apostle to the Apostles'," The Nazarene Way of Essenic Studies, at: http://www.thenazareneway.com/