Pages

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Being Bilingual May Boost Your Brain Power

http://www.npr.org/2011/04/04/135043787/being-bilingual-may-boost-your-brain-power

Being Bilingual May Boost Your Brain Power

by GRETCHEN CUDA-KROEN
At the Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences at the University of Washington, 9-month-olds listen to Mandarin Chinese in play sessions with native speakers of Mandarin. On this week's podcast, we'll hear how some psychologists say being bilingual may actually be good for children's cognitive development.
Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences/AP
At the Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences at the University of Washington, 9-month-olds listen to Mandarin Chinese in play sessions with native speakers of Mandarin. On this week's podcast, we'll hear how some psychologists say being bilingual may actually be good for children's cognitive development.
text size A A A
April 4, 2011
In an interconnected world, speaking more than one language is becoming increasingly common. Approximately one-fifth of Americans speak a non-English language at home, and globally, as many as two-thirds of children are brought up bilingual.
Research suggests that the growing numbers of bilingual speakers may have an advantage that goes beyond communication: It turns out that being bilingual is also good for your brain.
Judy and Paul Szentkiralyi both grew up bilingual in the U.S., speaking Hungarian with their families and English with their peers. When they first started dating, they spoke English with each other.
But they knew they wanted to raise their children speaking both languages, so when things turned serious they did something unusual — they decided to switch to Hungarian.
Today, Hungarian is the primary language the Szentkiralyis use at home. Their two daughters — Hannah, 14, and Julia, 8 — speak both languages fluently, and without any accent. But they both heard only Hungarian from mom and dad until the age of 3 or 4, when they started school.
"When she did go to preschool that accent was very thick – she counted like Vun, two, tree," said Judy Szentkiralyi, recalling Hanna's early experience with English. "And by the time four or five months went by, it was totally gone."
Dispelling Confusion Around Bilingualism
The Szentkiralyis say that most people were supportive, but not everyone. Paul recounts an uncomfortable confrontation Judy once had in the local grocery store.
"I remember one time you came home and you said this one lady was like, 'When is she going to learn English?' And it was like, 'Well, when she goes to school she'll learn English,'" he said.
For a bilingual who really has two good languages that they use, both of them are always active.
- Ellen Bialystok, a psychologist from York University in Toronto
"People would often say, 'Well, won't they get confused?" added Judy. "And I would have to explain, 'Well, no, it wasn't confusing for us.'"
The idea that children exposed to two languages from birth become confused or that they fall behind monolingual children is a common misconception, says Janet Werker, a psychologist at the University of British Columbia who studies language acquisition in bilingual babies.
"Growing up bilingual is just as natural as growing up monolingual," said Werker, whose own research indicates babies of bilingual mothers can distinguish between languages even hours after birth.
"There is absolutely no evidence that bilingual acquisition leads to confusion, and there is no evidence that bilingual acquisition leads to delay," she said.
Werker and other researchers say the evidence to the contrary is actually quite strong. Instead of holding you back, being bilingual, they say, may actually be good for you.
Tuning In To The Right Signal
Ellen Bialystok, a psychologist from York University in Toronto, says the reason lies in the way the bilingual mind uses language.
"We don't really know very much in psychology," said Bialystok. "But the one thing that has been so overwhelmingly proven, that I can say with great certainty, is this: For a bilingual who really has two good languages that they use, both of them are always active."
In other words, no matter what language a person is speaking at the moment, both languages are active in the brain.
"The evidence is very dramatic. Even if you are in a context that is utterly monolingual, where you think there is absolutely no reason to think about Chinese or Spanish or French, it is part of the activated network that's going on in your brain," she said.
This means that bilinguals have to do something that monolinguals don't do — they have to keep the two languages separate. Bialystok likens it to tuning into the right signal on the radio or television: The brain has to keep the two channels separate and pay attention to only one.
"The brain has a perfectly good system whose job it is to do just that — it's the executive control system. It focuses attention on what's important and ignores distraction. Therefore, for a bilingual, the executive control system is used in every sentence you utter. That's what makes it strong," said Bialystok.
Remodeling The Brain?
Constantly engaging this executive control function is a form of mental exercise, explains Bialystok, and some researchers, including herself, believe that this can be beneficial for the brain. Bilingual speakers have been shown to perform better on a variety of cognitive tasks, and one study Bialistok did found that dementia set in four to five years later in people who spent their lives speaking two languages instead of one.
"They can get a little extra mileage from these cognitive networks because they have been enhanced throughout life," said Bialystok.
And the advantages of bilingualism may be due to more than just "mental fitness." Bialystok says there's some preliminary evidence that being bilingual may physically remodel parts of the brain. It's something researchers are only beginning to look into, but she says there is reason to believe that speaking a second language may lead to important changes in brain structure as well.
***
Joke
What do they call someone who speaks several languages?
Multilingual.
What do they call someone who speaks two languages?
Bilingual.
What do they call someone who speaks one language?
An American
***
By the end of the Vietnam War, only two American universities offered graduate courses in Vietnamese. 


Trayvon Martin Cartoons

Don't Look To The U.S. For Freedom - Le Figaro


Can strip-searching citizens for almost any reason
be an acceptable part of living in a ‘free’ country?

U.S. Supreme Court Stands Up for Laying Citizens ‘Bare’ (Le Figaro, France)

“Such a loose conception of freedom is difficult to grasp… A government that can undress its citizens for not wearing a seatbelt has license to undress whoever it chooses. And to think that conservatives supposedly stand for a less intrusive government. It seems that, in fact, their idea is of a government that intrudes less into the pockets of the wealthiest. That is their notion of democracy.”

By Jean-Sébastien Stehli
                                           

Translated By Carolyn Yohn

April 9, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court: Divining the logic of its decisions is challenging for some.
What is so nice about the current Supreme Court, the most militant court in more than half a century, is that it opposes the expansion of federal powers when it works in the government's favor, but accepts expansion when it works in favor of citizens. For instance: the court has decided that contributions by corporations and lobbyists cannot be limited because it considers this an expression of free speech, and thus protected under the First Amendment. The result is a presidential campaign that will break all records in terms of financial debauchery, with several billionaires funding absolutely ludicrous candidates. Another example is that the court may soon decide that the state cannot compel citizens to have health coverage.

But when it comes to humiliating citizens in violation of the Constitution (the Fourth Amendment), the Supreme Court has responded to the call.

[Editor’s Note: This article refers to the case of Florence v. Board of Freeholders. See video below].

By a five to four vote, conservative judges on the Supreme Court decided that any citizen can be forced to permit a strip search, even in the case of a minor offense - and even if there is no reason to suspect a felony or crime. Henceforth, explained one of the dissenting judges, a bike with a faulty bell or broken turn signal can lead to the offender being strip searched. The Supreme Court held that there is nothing excessive or degrading about being forced to lay bare before a representative of the state. Such a loose conception of freedom is difficult to grasp. Up to now, case law dictated that police were only permitted to conduct a body search when, for example, there is cause to suspect the person of hiding weapons or drugs. Ten states, including Florida and Michigan (not exactly bastions of leftism), forbid strip searches without serious cause.

Posted by Worldmeets.US
 
SEE ALSO ON THIS:


http://worldmeets.us/ http://worldmeets.us/lefigaro0000338.shtml#ixzz1tLUeFAUW

Obama brings illegal immigration to a standstill. Latinos "heading home."

On Obama's "watch," illegal immigration has come to a standstill. The number of undocumented latinos residing in the United States has declined by 13%. More illegals have been deported during Obama's first 3 years in office than Bush deported in 8.


***

Net immigration between U.S. and Mexico at a standstill

By Juan Castillo
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

April 23, 2012

Immigration from Mexico, the source of the largest wave of migration in history from a single nation to the United States, has ground to a virtual standstill, according to a new analysis of government data from both countries.
Net migration from Mexico might actually have reversed in the past year or two, meaning more Mexicans are leaving the U.S. than arriving, according to the analysis released Monday by the Pew Hispanic Center. It linked the development to a number of factors, including weakened U.S. job markets, toughened border enforcement and more deportations, a long-term decline in Mexico's birthrates and slightly more favorable economic conditions in Mexico.
The precipitous decline in migration from Mexico has been documented for at least the past five years, and in 2008 the Mexican Migration Project at Princeton reported that net migration had fallen to zero. Still, the findings in the Pew report are notable given the previous four decades that brought 12 million current Mexican immigrants — more than half of whom came to the U.S. illegally.
"We've told pieces of this story in the past, but this is the most comprehensive look we've been able to put together," said Paul Taylor, director of the Pew Hispanic Center. "This is an historic wave which at least over a five-year period seems to have come to a standstill."
A key to the findings was access to 2010 Mexican census records, which senior Pew demographer Jeffrey Passel said were the first "that showed definitive numbers about people going back to Mexico."
According to the report, during the period from 2005 to 2010, a total of 1.4 million Mexicans immigrated to the United States, down from the 3 million who did so from 1995 to 2000.
During the same period, the number of Mexicans and their children who moved from the U.S. to Mexico rose to 1.4 million, about twice the number who did so in the five-year period a decade before.
Researchers said the trends suggest that the return flow to Mexico probably exceeded inflow from Mexico during the past year or two. The report does not contain annual or state data and does not separate legal and illegal immigration.
Of the 1.4 million who migrated from the U.S. to Mexico, a significant majority did so voluntarily, researchers said, although they did not discount the impact of heightened immigration enforcement among the confluence of factors contributing to the migration standstill.
The report estimated that 5 to 35 percent of immigrants who returned to Mexico might not have done so of their own will.
According to the report, as the U.S. deployed more Border Patrol agents, arrests of Mexicans trying to cross the border illegally plummeted from more than 1 million in 2005 to 286,000 in 2011. Passel said that figure was the lowest number of apprehensions since 1971, adding, "It tells a story of major change."
To some extent, the net migration drop appears to parallel the decline of the U.S. economy and withering job opportunities for Mexican immigrants, said Néstor Rodriguez, with the Population Research Center at the University of Texas, adding that the economy is a perennial facet of the immigration story.
A sociology professor whose expertise includes immigration and U.S. deportations to Mexico, Rodriguez said student researchers interviewed returning Mexican immigrants last year.
"Some (returning immigrants) say, ‘I'd rather be unemployed in Mexico than in the U.S.' Many are being deported. A good number are taking back money to start new businesses" in Mexico, Rodriguez said.
Passel, the Pew researcher, said the U.S. housing construction bust, in particular, hit a substantial number of unauthorized Mexican workers.
According to the Pew report, a growing share of unauthorized Mexican immigrants deported home said they will not try to come back to the U.S. In a survey by Mexican authorities, 20 percent of immigrants in 2010 said they would not return, compared with 7 percent in 2005.
The report also notes Mexico's changing demography and its plummeting birthrates over the past half-century. In 2009, a Mexican woman was projected to have an average of 2.4 children in her lifetime, compared with 7.3 for her 1960 counterpart.
Rodriguez said that with declining birthrates, there might be less pressure on Mexican families to immigrate to the U.S.
Contact Juan Castillo at 445-3635


Miscarriage of Justice, Texas Style



Dear F and J,

Next time you're tempted to worry about murderous predators, focus first on pneumonitis.

"For the first time since 1965, homicide is no longer one of the top 15 causes of death in the US. The murder rate dropped enough in 2010 that was overtaken at # 15 by pneumonitis, a respiratory disease that mainly afflicts people older than 75."

This morning NPR broadcast an eyepopping report about miscarriage of justice - http://www.npr.org/2012/04/28/150996459/free-after-25-years-a-tale-of-murder-and-injustice 

As a courtroom interpreter -- and a victim of violent crime once pushed by Chief Detective Fantagrossi to identify someone who looked vaguely like one of my assailants - I am appallingly aware that district attorneys and police departments are "out to get somebody." 

Often their prosecutorial target does not matter, so long as they "get somebody." I understand the urge for "punishment" and "closure" but I also understand how quickly urges become habitual regardless their larger ramifications. 

Were it not for friend Steve Gibson's family wealth (and consequent ability to re-enact a crime in court, complete with a mock screen door and duplicated "light conditions"), Steve would have languished in an Illinois prison for armed robbery. 

Later in life Steve's illustrious career as a registered nurse would not have happened.

Again, I draw your attention to "The Caging of America: Why Do We Lock Up So Many People?" - http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2012/04/caging-of-america-why-do-we-lock-up-so.html

Michael Morton and his mother, Patricia Morton, in October after a judge announced him free on bond after nearly 25 years in prison for a wrongful conviction.

Free After 25 Years: A Tale Of Murder And Injustice

Michael Morton was convicted of killing his wife and put in prison for life. DNA evidence finally freed him, but it took a quarter-century to force Texas officials to reveal the evidence that exonerated him.




Friday, April 27, 2012

70 ton meteor explodes over California with near force of atomic bomb



***

Fragments Found of Meteor That Exploded Over California

California Meteor
Near the site of the discovery that launched the Gold Rush more than 150 years ago, meteorite hunter Robert Ward has tracked down another sort of rock —fragments of a minivan-sized meteor that blew up in the sky above California's Sierra foothills early on Sunday.

Ward, who has been hunting for meteorites for more than 20 years, told the Associated Press Thursday that he found a pair of fragments weighing about 10 grams each roughly 35 miles northeast of Sacramento nearby Sutter's Mill, the famous location where James W. Marshall discovered gold in 1848.

"It was just, needless to say, a thrilling moment," Ward, who claims to have found meteorites on every continent save Antarctica, told the news agency.
The meteor burned up spectacularly after slamming into the Earth's atmosphere early Sunday morning at just under 34,000 miles per hour and generating energy equivalent to the explosion of three to five kilotons of TNT, or about one-third the explosive force of an atomic bomb, according to Bill Cooke, director of NASA's Meteoroid Environment Office.
With an estimated mass of 70 metric tons, the meteor is believed to have been one of the largest to strike the Earth's atmosphere in recent years, and certainly one of the largest to explode over an area where its spectacular fireball could be observed as it hurtled through the sky.
Meteors the size of the one that rattled windows from Central California to Nevada crash into our atmosphere about once a year but such events usually happen over the ocean or uninhabited land, Don Yeomans of NASA's Near-Earth Object Program Office told the AP.
"Getting to see one is something special," Yeomans said. "Most meteors you see in the night's sky are the size of tiny stones or even grains of sand, and their trail lasts all of a second or two."
Ward said the two fragments he found confirmed that the meteorite is a type called carbonaceous chondrite that has been kicking around in space since the formation of the solar system some 4.5 billion years ago—making it "one of the oldest things known to man and one of the rarest types of meteorites there is," he told the news agency.
"CM" meteorites, as they are known, can contain amino acids and organic compounds, potentially making Ward's find "extremely important to science," he said.
For more from Damon, follow him on Twitter @dpoeter


Conservative Christians and Global Warming

What If Global Warming Is A Hoax?


Dear K,

“Global Warming Hoax Hoax” is excellent. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=N4wxHCYevTY

Thanks for sending.

When the CGI female notes that the media present false “debates” by pitting uninformed opinion against scientitific finding, she goes on to say that opinionated sound bites can be spewed in a matter of seconds whereas scientific findings require lengthy explanation.

"Global Warming Hoax Hoax" reminds me of fine work done by Minnesota scientist, John Abraham, who explains global warming in a point by point refutation of "climate deniers." 

Some of the most adroit denial has been propagated by British Lord, Christopher Moncton.

Professor Abraham's explanation of climate science (as it relate to Moncton's relentless mendacity) is meticulously well done but - ironically - hobbled by its very meticulousness. 

Complex scientific matters cannot be clarified through sound bites, whereas sound bites are an excellent vehicle for presenting falsehood as Truth.

Resources:


2.) A comprehensive view of Monckton's global warming denial - http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/jun/08/monckton-gift-climate-denial

3.) Minnesota climate scientist, John Abraham - http://www.stthomas.edu/engineering/jpabraham/
(I also recommend NPR’s “Climate Change: Public Skeptical, Scientists Sure” -http://www.npr.org/2011/06/21/137309964/climate-change-public-skeptical-scientists-sure)

***
Meta-level politics...

Recent work by Jonathan Haidt, Drew Westen and E.O. Wilson focuses the psychological dimension of each person's "political positioning.” 

1.) Bill Moyers interviews Jonathan Haidt, author of “The Righteous Mind.” 
“How Conservatives and Liberals See the World.”

2.) Interview with Drew Weston, author of “The Political Brain.” 


We have long known that humans "hear what they want to hear and disregard the rest.” 

It is now coming clear that our motivation for "hearing what we want to hear" is rooted in axiomatic norms consciously and unconsciously communicated by our social, political and religious "tribes." 

In addition to such tribal conditioning from infancy on, humans are also subject to cerebral re-wiring based on "social control" of "individual thought."

In recent years, I have grown keenly aware that conservative Christians are heirs to a medieval mindset subsequently ratified by Protestantism's focus on "individual conscience." Together, these harmonic outlooks established a conservative moral code that was (and is) radically individual.

Furthermore, these self-sealed believers are existentially compelled to disavow any need for "collective” human action, and, as a result, the catastrophes of global warming accumulate. 

If conservative Christians were to acknowledge any need for “collective” action, their centuries-old assumption that all morality (and all responsibility) is individual-and-personal would give way to a categorically different assumption that large swathes of morality impose social, political and economic obligations that can only be discharged by collective action.

According to the received wisdom, eternal salvation has “always” depended on each individual's “personal relationship with God.” It is therefore “impossible” for Christian conservatives to conceive any need for collective action without simultaneously acknowledging that collective action obliges abandonment of the only "ground" that guarantees personal “salvation.”

This situation is complicated by a widespread Christian belief in "providential patriarchy."

According to the patriarchal view of Providence, God knows our needs and always answers them individually.

Part of this “bargain” is that God simultaneously insures – by miracle if necessary -- the smooth functioning of all “large-scale, over-arching, non-individual systems” such as environmental stability, dependable water-and-energy supplies, and providential "healing" for everyone who submits to The Patriarchal Order mandated by God. 

If anything goes wildly wrong with this divinely-ordered scenario, Christian conservatives are prepared to defer, immediately, to the massive psychological "default" that God has, at long last, chosen to unleash The End Times

Ironically, this psychological arabesque supplies bedrock justification for personal irresponsibility, and does so in the minds of those Christians most eager to proclaim personal responsibility.

By this weird gymnastic contortion, Christian conservatives obviate all need for the kind of personal responsibility they have always touted as The Foundation of all that is good - whether "the good" is individual, social, political or economic.

In the end, conservative Christians profess The Transcendental Good of Religious Freedom while painting themselves into "ideological corners" from which there is NO escape unless they admit their individual sinfulness as unfaithful servants who no longer trust in God's providence.

Which brings us back to The Middle Ages and The Protestant Reformation when individual conscience (completely divorced from collective conscience) was deemed "the human half" of a two-way bargain in which all overarching "collective needs" were submitted -- with complete faithfulness! -- to the ministration of God’s Providence.

Pax

Alan


From: KK
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:13 PM
Subject: The Climate Change "Hoax" Hoax
Spot on:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=N4wxHCYevTY
For several humourous cartoons, search youtube for xtranormal .
Ken