Sunday, June 30, 2013

CNN Special: "Five things to know about guns"

Fear sends shoppers into gun store

  • Obama is seeking to fund work into how to stop gun violence
  • The NRA says such research is not necessary
  • For the first time, protection outranks hunting as a reason to own guns
Excerpt: "A national survey published in March by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press reported that nearly half (48%) of gun owners say the main reason they own a gun is for protection, up from 26% who gave that answer in 1999... The findings make no sense, since violent crime in the country overall has dropped by 48% since 1993, according to Kellermann. Perhaps even more important -- and less understood -- is the evidence that the benefits of keeping a gun for protection are far outweighed by the risks, he said."
What happens when the right to bear arms comes under fire? Morgan Spurlock gets a personal look Sunday at 10 p.m. ET/PT on CNN's "Inside Man."
(CNN) -- This weekend, Morgan Spurlock's "Inside Man" gives CNN viewers an inside and in-depth look at the issue of firearms -- as viewed from behind the counter of a gun store. Here are five things to know about the debate:
1 -- There is no debate about the impact of gun violence. In 2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tallied more than 31,000 firearm deaths in the United States. Each year, some 55,000 violent deaths occur in the country, costing $60 billion in medical care and lost productivity, according to the agency. More than 38,000 people in the country are suicides.
But, more than six months after 20 children and six adults were killed in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, legislative efforts to stem the impact of gun violence have failed to gain traction. "At this point, nothing is different," said Dr. Arthur Kellermann, a policy analyst at the Rand Corporation in Washington who has witnessed the power of firearms as a hunter and gun owner and as an emergency room doctor. "The public's attention has moved on."
2 -- Much of what we know is outdated. That's because, in 1996, pressure from the National Rifle Association led Congress to cut $2.6 million from the budget of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Center for Injury Prevention that had been devoted to finding out what works.
To underscore its point, Congress -- in a move led by Jay Dickey, a former gun-rights advocate and Republican legislator from Arkansas -- added this language to the agency's appropriation: "None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control."
Congress added the same restrictive language it had imposed on the CDC to all agencies of the Department of Health and Human Services after a National Institutes of Health study concluded that a person carrying a gun was nearly 4.5 times more likely to be shot in an assault than someone who is unarmed.
Morgan Spurlock visits a firing range
Morgan Spurlock was rejected and broke
Today, 17 years after the CDC restrictions were put in place, the NRA maintains its position that government research into gun violence is not necessary.
"What works to reduce gun violence is to make sure that criminals are prosecuted and those who have been found to be a danger to themselves or others don't have access to firearms," the NRA's director of public affairs, Andrew Arulanandam, told CNN early this year. "Not to carry out more studies."
3 -- But more studies may be in the cards. The Obama administration has signaled it wants to resume such efforts. This month, the Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council laid out priorities for a research agenda to help policymakers better understand the causes and impact of gun violence and how to reduce it. The report says progress can be made in three to five years through research into the characteristics of gun violence, risk and protective factors, prevention and other interventions, gun safety technology, and the influence of video games and other media.
The report came after President Obama ordered in January that federal agencies -- including the CDC -- identify the most pressing firearm-related violence research needs and signaled that he wanted to devote $10 million per year to the task.
How successful will it be? "It's too early to tell," according to Kellermann. But he worried in a telephone interview that the matter could wind up as a tug of war between CDC and legislators in the House, who are responsible for passing -- or not passing -- appropriations. "You can see the most highly respected public health institution in the world turn into a rag doll between a determined administration and the equally determined House" majority, he said.
"I'm just hoping that research will be restarted," he said. "Surely we can agree that having a better understanding of effective strategies to reduce gun violence is a worthwhile goal that everybody ought to be able to agree on."
Off the radar of the gun debate, which has focused on assault weapons bans and background checks, has been the fact that community-level strategies have already been shown to lower gang violence in a number of cities, he said.
Rather than racing after every 911 call, it makes sense to break the chain of events -- such as illegal gun trafficking, illegal acquisition and illegal carrying -- that often lead to the next 911 call, he said.
Focusing police efforts on the highest-risk people and places works, he said. Between 1997 and 2007, "Atlanta put that strategy in place and, over a decade, had a 50% reduction in homicides."
4 -- If you choose to own a gun, do it responsibly. Whatever one thinks about gun control, anyone who opts to own a gun should store it responsibly. Incidents in which a family member is killed or injured by a gun in the home far outnumber the times when a gun is used to injure or kill an intruder in self-defense, Kellermann said.
"What people must understand is that the gun that is kept loaded and readily available for protection is also readily available to a curious child, to a depressed or upset teen, an angry spouse or a depressed grandparent."
5 -- Reasons for owning a gun have changed. A national survey published in March by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press reported that nearly half (48%) of gun owners say the main reason they own a gun is for protection, up from 26% who gave that answer in 1999.
Less than a third (32%) cited hunting as the main reason, down from nearly half (49%) in 1999.
The findings make no sense, since violent crime in the country overall has dropped by 48% since 1993, according to Kellermann.
Perhaps even more important -- and less understood -- is the evidence that the benefits of keeping a gun for protection are far outweighed by the risks, he said.
But those studies are more than 17 years old and out of date, which is why, he said, new research is needed.

National Geographic:"First Person: Save a Language, Save a Culture"

A Marma farmer poses for a portrait in a ginger field.
The grassroots initiative hopes to revive threatened indigenous languages throughout Bangladesh, like the language of this Marma ginger farmer.
Photograph by Alex Treadway, National Geographic
Tim Brookes.
Tim Brookes at work. Photograph courtesy Tim Brookes

Grassroots initiative seeks to revive threatened languages of Bangladesh.

Tim Brookes
Published June 28, 2013
Part of our First Person series, where we invite writers to share personal stories.
Of the world's 6,000-plus languages, half are expected to be extinct by the end of the century.
I knew nothing about this linguistic catastrophe until four years ago, when more or less by accident I began carving the alphabets of endangered languages.
I'd spent my life as a nonfiction writer, with no pretensions to be a visual artist, when one Christmas I decided to make gifts for my family by carving their names in boards of Vermont maple, with the bark still on and a beautiful ripple in the grain.
These came out surprisingly well, and in casting around for something else to carve, I stumbled on, an online encyclopedia of the world's hundred or more writing systems.
Their range and variety were amazing. Some were alphabets with symbols to represent all the vowels and consonants. Some were syllabaries, in which each symbol represented a syllable, and some were abjads, consisting mostly or entirely of consonants.
Some were astonishingly graceful and fluid (the Balinese script looks like a flock of birds), while others were minimalornate, or downright exotic: The Dongba script used by the Naxi people in China includes baffling pictograms that look like folding chairs and jellyfish.
My most striking and disturbing discovery, though, was that fully a third are in danger of extinction.
I decided to carve some of the scripts to draw attention to the problem of language loss and cultural erosion. The carvings have since been exhibited in schools, libraries, and universities across the United States and Europe.
Working with a set of gouges and a paintbrush, I created several dozen pieces depicting words, phrases, sentences, or poems in vanishing alphabets from all over the world, including three scripts of indigenous peoples in Bangladesh: the Mro, Marma, and Chakma.
At the time I had no idea I would meet a member of the Marma people, a remarkable man named Maung Nyeu, and that we would collaborate on a preservation project that may become a model of how to reverse linguistic decline and the cultural collapse that goes with it.
Why Do Scripts Matter?
"Scripts are a hugely important aspect of culture," write Martin Raymond and Lorna Evans of ScriptSource, the world's leading authority.
Writing is intimately associated with cultural identity. Each writing system tells the tale of its culture's history, its evolving technology, even its deeply embedded values.
In sub-Saharan Africa alone, more than a dozen scripts have been formulated for indigenous languages since 1900.
"The N'Ko script," Raymond and Evans note, "was originally created in 1949 for Bambara, one of the Manding languages of Mali, which, at that time, was written using the Latin script.
"N'Ko script was adopted by other Manding language groups because, unlike Latin, it was seen as a script of their culture. N'Ko has become one of the most widely used indigenous African scripts, and it has strengthened the Manding cultural identity."

A carving of the N’Ko script.
Photograph courtesy Tim Brookes

If scripts are vital to a society, why do they die?
For the same reason languages die. One culture is dominated by another (economically, militarily, politically, and/or technologically), sometimes with extreme consequences: Shong Lue Yang was assassinated by Laotian troops for creating a script for the Hmong.
Suppression of indigenous peoples is happening right now in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh.
Bangladesh's Imperiled Cultures
I must confess that when I started my project, my interest in carving and exhibiting scripts was a little theoretical—after all, I couldn't actually read or write what I was carving, and I had never seen language or script endangerment up close.
All that changed in June 2012, when I first met Maung Nyeu, in Boston.
He had stumbled on my website and seen, to his amazement, that someone not only knew about the threatened languages of the Hill Tracts but had actually carved them.
The Hill Tracts, a forested upland area in southeastern Bangladesh, are home to more than a dozen indigenous peoples who are distinct from the majority Bengali population in language, culture, and religion.
Over the past two decades, the region has become increasingly militarized, and traditional farmlands have been given to Bengali settlers.
According to Amnesty International, the Bangladeshi government's failure to address legal rights to traditional lands in the eastern Chittagong Hill Tracts has left tens of thousands landless.
Local people are trapped in a cycle of violent clashes with Bengali settlers.
Villages and temples have been burned, and indigenous women and girls have been abducted to be sold into the sex trade. Massacres have been documented.
Lack of education and language collapse are pernicious threats: More than half of the indigenous people of the Hill Tracts have no formal schooling.
For those who start school, fewer than 8 percent complete primary education, and only 2 percent secondary.
This isn't surprising, because instruction is in Bangla, which most Hill Tracts children don't understand.
Adding injury to insult, indigenous children are often abused by teachers and students from the country's largest ethnic group, Bengalis. Maung himself suffered mistreatment.
In a single generation, Maung said, he has seen his people go from living as self-sufficient farmers on ancestral lands to being vagrant day laborers scattered across Bangladesh and into India and Myanmar.
Language Nurturer
Remarkably, Maung flouted the norm, earning a degree in engineering at the University of Hawaii, then an MBA from the University of Southern California.
He returned to the Hill Tracts to build the Padamu Residential Education Center, a school on the grounds of a Buddhist temple, so the children of the Hill Tracts could be educated in their own languages.
Classes began in 2008. Change was immediately apparent: Children who had seemed destined to be domestics or day laborers announced their intention to be doctors and teachers.
But most of the students could no longer speak their own ethnic language.
So Maung came back to the U.S., to the Harvard Graduate School of Education, to learn how to create a culturally relevant curriculum that would revive the dying languages of the Hill Tracts.
At the nearby Massachusetts Institute of Technology, he sought out the advice of the philosopher and linguist Noam Chomsky.
"He was very kind and very attentive," Maung said. "His recommendation was that it is possible to preserve a language, but it needs to start with the children, preferably as part of their curriculum."
For Maung, a culturally relevant curriculum must be taught in the language the child speaks at home—the language the child is already learning and is using to find out about the world.
Also, the material being taught must be familiar. Maung remembered that at school he had to learn by heart William Wordsworth's poem "Daffodils."
"I had never seen a daffodil!" he laughed. "I had no idea what it looked like. We have all sorts of plants and flowers, but I never saw a daffodil until I came to the United States!"
Maung has collected more than 40 stories passed down in the villages of the Hill Tracts. The stories involve mountains and trees and animals the children already know—tales they may have heard from their parents and grandparents.
He is beginning the process of having them translated into Mro, Marma, and Chakma, writing them out, getting them illustrated in a visual idiom familiar to the children, and getting them published.
He faces an additional challenge. Most people in these groups still speak their traditional languages, but very few can now read and write their unique scripts.
That's where I came in.
In June 2012 Maung and I set up a partnership to create and publish his schoolbooks and, we hope, to help save the languages that sustain the cultures of the Hill Tracts.
I recruited a calligrapher at Louisiana State University to take the handwritten forms of the scripts and turn them into works of art.
I enlisted a typographer from Anglia University in England to make Mro, Marma, and Chakma fonts so that the books can be digitally printed.
I hand-carved texts in each of the three languages.
A friend, using a laser, experimented with burning the scripts into mahogany boards. Some are now on display in community centers in the Hill Tracts.
One of Maung's fellow Harvard students created illustrations for the first book.
This fall, students of mine from Champlain College, in Burlington, Vermont, will help write, edit, design, and illustrate the next books bound for Padamu.
Signs of Revival
Reversing the decline of a language is a Herculean task, and there are no guarantees that Maung will succeed.
But there are signs that the tide of globalism that has been eroding indigenous cultures and their languages may be turning.
Some of the same multinational corporations that are creating a global online culture recognize that they can play a positive part.
Apple and Google in particular have shown an interest in endangered languages. One example: Macs, iPhones, Google, and Gmail now recognize the Cherokee syllabary.
And in the Philippines, where the pre-Spanish script called Baybayin was widely believed to be extinct, the government has now adopted Baybayin symbols on its banknotes as an anti-counterfeiting device.
So there is hope—but there is also urgency.
"In medicine," Maung explained, "there is a window of time—maybe a few minutes to two hours, called the golden hour—where if the person can get to the ER, the chance of survival increases. For our children, their golden hour is between the ages of four or five and twelve. If we don't get them in school during this time, we won't get them at all."
Tim Brookes is founder of the Endangered Alphabets Project and author of 13 books, including Endangered Alphabets. His website
Brookes and Maung Nyeu will speak about endangered alphabets and the Chittagong Hill Tracts at 1:15 p.m., June 28, at the Smithsonian Folklife Festivalon the National Mall in Washington, D.C.
How to help: To raise funds for schoolbooks for the children of the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Maung founded a nonprofit organization, Our Golden Hour, where donations can be made.

Paul Cassidy
Paul Cassidy
People who complain about the loss of languages should take a few years to learn a language that only 500 people speak, just to help keep it alive.  That's what they're asking the presumed native speakers to do--at enormous cost to their life prospects.
Michael Quinlan
Michael Quinlan
An inspiring effort and story. If I may mention something I'm involved with personally, many initiatives in support of languages of limited commercial interest are about codifying or archiving a language. There is however a pro bono project aimed at creating world-class language learning technology in such languages. No charge. See "The 7000 Languages Project" and the "NCOLCTL 7000 Partnership," for anyone interested. NCOLCTL is the US-based National Organization of Less Commonly Taught Languages. The technology is provided by Transparent Language, Inc. of Nashua, NH, USA.
Rick Boros
Rick Boros
Like products, languages and cultures disappear and are naturally replaced when a more effective tool becomes available.
A group is best served by teaching vocational and language skills that are universally accepted and needed.  More than enough is too much. 

Michael Quinlan
Michael Quinlan
If you come from a musical family, you will play an instrument even if you do not make your living with it. It's part of where you came from and who you are. A heritage language is like that. I recognize and appreciate that you are trying to keep children from being ghetto-ized in a language with poor career prospects, but it doesn't have to be one or the other.
Wilf Tarquin
Wilf Tarquin
So what.
There's no intrinsic value to keeping languages, or cultures, alive. What matters are THE PEOPLE in the culture, and they're universally better served by learning a majority language and assimilating into the majority culture.
Ideally there would only be one language and one culture. You disagree? Boring, you say? Then YOU switch to speaking only some minority language, don't demand that people in dying cultures should languish in obscurity for your entertainment.
Disclaimer: I speak seven languages. My mother tongue is a minority language.
Peter Blaise Monahon
Peter Blaise Monahon
@Wilf Tarquin
Apparently, you are right, for you, since merely "speaking" 7 languages has not helped you appreciate the advantages of multiculturalism and the life of a people and their culture as encoded in their language.
May I suggest reading any book, perhaps the new one by Hofstadter & Sander in 2013 entitled "Surfaces and Essences - Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking", to expand our appreciation of the unique encoding of unique culture in unique language.
And then go out and try to actually appreciate people, not just the imprecision of translating languages back and forth for whatever external purpose -- you are paying attention to the wrong things.
Beside, there is not "one, majority" language -- even so-called English is is mishmash of every culture of every new speaker of English, and all are forever enriched by the incorporation of otherwise lost cultures.
Ben Tobias
Ben Tobias
Another champion of preserving dying languages and cultures was Dr. Kenneth Pike, from Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL), who was nominated 15 years in a row for the Nobel Peace Prize. 
Peace Seeker
Peace Seeker
In Greece, in a remote region of Arcadia, live the "stubborn" Tsakonians. For 3,000 years now, they have never stopped speaking their ancient dialect, the only survivor of Doric language. In the '60s a period of neglect began: compulsory schooling and forced use of the modern Greek language, roads, tourists, emigration contributed to the neglect. The Tsakonian case is not unique. According to the UN, half of the languages spoken today face the same threat of extinction and oblivion. This movie is about the loss of identity: what it means to know that your language will have vanished in a hundred years’ time.